Literature DB >> 10550509

Discrimination of short time intervals by the human observer.

G Westheimer1.   

Abstract

For time intervals in the 150-1500 ms range, the difference-discrimination thresholds are about 5%. The value of this Weber fraction varies somewhat depending whether the stimulus modality is vision, hearing or touch. Thresholds are higher when a time interval signaled in one modality has to be compared with one in another, and also when two different modalities are used to delineate a single time interval, as well as when onset and offset are in the same modality but signaled to opposite cortical hemispheres. There is a prominent practice effect. This effect was used to show that there is complete transfer of training between the two visual hemispheres. These findings imply that the time-discrimination mechanism is not located at an early stage of visual processing. If there is a single central time-discrimination apparatus, the observed intermodal differences must relate to the relative ease of access to it via different modalities. The mechanism involved needs elucidating. Counting of spikes or internal time modules would seem to be too simplistic a concept; there is still a need for a process in which the duration of a just concluded presentation and an internally stored interval duration can be compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10550509     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Temporal specificity of perceptual learning in an auditory discrimination task.

Authors:  Uma R Karmarkar; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 2.  Influence of the interstimulus interval on temporal processing and learning: testing the state-dependent network model.

Authors:  Dean V Buonomano; Jennifer Bramen; Mahsa Khodadadifar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception.

Authors:  Richard B Ivry; John E Schlerf
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Supramodal representation of temporal priors calibrates interval timing.

Authors:  Huihui Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Vigor of movements and the cost of time in decision making.

Authors:  Jennie E S Choi; Pavan A Vaswani; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Temporal resolution of single-photon responses in primate rod photoreceptors and limits imposed by cellular noise.

Authors:  Greg D Field; Valerie Uzzell; E J Chichilnisky; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neuronal correlates of visual time perception at brief timescales.

Authors:  J Patrick Mayo; Marc A Sommer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sleep-dependent consolidation benefits fast transfer of time interval training.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Lu Guo; Ming Bao
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Multisensory perceptual learning of temporal order: audiovisual learning transfers to vision but not audition.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect before cause: supramodal recalibration of sensorimotor timing.

Authors:  James Heron; James V M Hanson; David Whitaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.