Literature DB >> 10548613

Endometrial cell dissemination at diagnostic hysteroscopy: a prospective randomized cross-over comparison of normal saline and carbon dioxide uterine distension.

F Nagele1, F Wieser, A Deery, R Hart, A Magos.   

Abstract

The incidence of pelvic spreading of endometrial cells at diagnostic hysteroscopy was studied comparing the two distension media carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and normal saline (N/Saline). Thirty patients requiring laparoscopy and hysteroscopy were included in this study, the main indication for surgery being subfertility. Hysteroscopy was performed using both CO(2) and N/Saline distension on each patient, the order of the distension media being randomly allocated. Samples of peritoneal fluid were aspirated from the pouch of Douglas before and after hysteroscopy with each distension medium, and the specimens were investigated cytologically for the presence of endometrial cells. Endometrium was present in 2/30 (6.7%) peritoneal aspirates before and in 15/60 (25%) collected after the hysteroscopies. There was no major difference between liquid or gaseous distension, transtubal reflux of endometrial cells occurring in 7/30 (23.3%) and in 8/30 (26.7%) hysteroscopies respectively. Positive peritoneal cytology was observed significantly more often in patients who were in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle [9/14 (64.3%) versus 0/11, P < 0.004]. In conclusion, transtubal dissemination of endometrium occurs in about one quarter of patients, irrespective whether N/Saline or CO(2) is used for uterine distension; there is no advantage to using gaseous distension for hysteroscopy when investigating high-risk cases for endometrial malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10548613     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  3 in total

1.  Does duration of hysteroscopy increase the risk of disease recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer? A multi-centre trial.

Authors:  Clemens Tempfer; Georg Froese; Bernd Buerkle; Stephan Polterauer; Christoph Grimm; Nicole Concin; Gerda Hofstetter; Monika Weigert; Martin K Oehler
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Uterine distension media for outpatient hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Karim S Abdallah; Moustafa A Gadalla; Maria Breijer; Ben Willem J Mol
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-26

3.  Evaluation of the risk of spreading endometrial cell by hysteroscopy: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Rievani de Sousa Damião; Reginaldo Guedes Coelho Lopes; Emilly Serapião Dos Santos; Umberto Gazzi Lippi; Eduardo Borges da Fonseca
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009-05-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.