Literature DB >> 22977610

Does duration of hysteroscopy increase the risk of disease recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer? A multi-centre trial.

Clemens Tempfer1, Georg Froese, Bernd Buerkle, Stephan Polterauer, Christoph Grimm, Nicole Concin, Gerda Hofstetter, Monika Weigert, Martin K Oehler.   

Abstract

Women with endometrial cancer often undergo hysteroscopy during their diagnostic work-up. Whether or not the duration of hysteroscopy affects the rate of positive peritoneal cells and the duration of recurrence-free survival is unknown. In a retrospective multi-centre study, the records of 552 patients with endometrial cancer were investigated. Duration of hysteroscopy was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient survival data. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] duration of hysteroscopy was 18.2 (10.5) min in the study population and 17.9 (10.1) min and 17.9 (10.2) min in patients with positive (n=109) and negative peritoneal cytology (n=443), respectively (p=0.9). There were no statistically significant correlations between duration of hysteroscopy and positive peritoneal cytology (p=0.6; rho=-0.028), FIGO stage (p=0.2; rho=-0.080), lymph node involvement (p=0.2; rho=0.106) and patient age (p=0.5; rho=0.033). Longer duration of hysteroscopy (>15 min) was not associated with positive peritoneal cytology (yes vs. no, p=0.8), advanced tumour stage (FIGO I vs. II, III and IV, p=0.3), lymph node involvement (yes vs. no, p=0.1) and patient age (≤65 vs. >65 years, p=0.4). In a multivariate analysis, FIGO stage [p<0.0001; hazard ratio (HR)=5.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-10.2], lymph node involvement (p=0.02; HR=3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.8) and patient age (p=0.003; HR=2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.2), but not duration of hysteroscopy (p=0.4; HR=1.2, 95% CI 0.7-2.2), were associated with recurrence-free survival. We conclude that longer duration of hysteroscopy does not increase the risk of positive peritoneal cytology and it is not an adverse prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival in patients with endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22977610      PMCID: PMC3440816          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2011.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  13 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic hysteroscopy to evaluate the cause of abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  S P Serden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Endometrial assessment re-visited.

Authors:  C P Spencer; M I Whitehead
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-07

3.  Carcinoma of the corpus uteri.

Authors:  W T Creasman; F Odicino; P Maisonneuve; U Beller; J L Benedet; A P Heintz; H Y Ngan; M Sideri; S Pecorelli
Journal:  J Epidemiol Biostat       Date:  2001

4.  The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  S Nag; B Erickson; S Parikh; N Gupta; M Varia; G Glasgow
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Does hysteroscopy facilitate tumor cell dissemination? Incidence of peritoneal cytology from patients with early stage endometrial carcinoma following dilatation and curettage (D & C) versus hysteroscopy and D & C.

Authors:  A Obermair; M Geramou; F Gucer; U Denison; A H Graf; E Kapshammer; W Neunteufel; I Frech; A Kaider; C Kainz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Intraperitoneal dissemination of endometrial cancer cells after hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolaos P Polyzos; Davide Mauri; Spyridon Tsioras; Christina I Messini; Antonis Valachis; Ioannis E Messinis
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Risk of long-term pelvic recurrences after fluid minihysteroscopy in women with endometrial carcinoma: a controlled randomized study.

Authors:  Ettore Cicinelli; Raffaele Tinelli; Giuseppe Colafiglio; Francesca Fortunato; Annarita Fusco; Salvatore Mastrolia; Anna Rosa Fucci; Achiropita Lepera
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Does hysteroscopy affect prognosis in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer?

Authors:  A Ben-Arie; S Tamir; S Dubnik; O Gemer; A Ben Shushan; R Dgani; G Peer; O Barnett-Griness; O Lavie
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 9.  Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a systematic quantitative review.

Authors:  T Justin Clark; Doris Voit; Janesh K Gupta; Christopher Hyde; Fujian Song; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Hysteroscopy does not increase the risk of microscopic extrauterine spread in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  L Selvaggi; G Cormio; O Ceci; G Loverro; A Cazzolla; S Bettocchi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.437

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Lymph Node Count-Based AJCC Staging System Facilitates a More Accurate Prediction of the Prognosis of Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Xinlong Huo; Shufang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.