Literature DB >> 10548056

Mutants of ETS domain PU.1 and GGAA/T recognition: free energies and kinetics.

F Pio1, N Assa-Munt, J Yguerabide, R A Maki.   

Abstract

The ETS family members display specific DNA binding site preferences. As an example, PU.1 and ETS-1 recognize different DNA sequences with a core element centered over 5'-GGAA-3' and 5'-GGAA/T-3', respectively. To understand the molecular basis of this recognition, we carried out site-directed mutagenesis experiments followed by DNA binding studies that use electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and surface plasmon resonance methods. EMSA experiments identified amino acid changes A231S and/or N236Y as being important for PU.1 recognition of both 5'-GGAA-3' and 5'-GGAT-3' containing oligonucleotides. To confirm these data and obtain accurate binding parameters, we performed kinetic studies using surface plasmon resonance on these mutants. The N236Y substitution revealed a weak protein-DNA interaction with the 5'-GGAA-3' containing oligonucleotide caused by a faster release of the protein from the DNA (k(off) tenfold higher than the wild-type protein). With the double mutant A231S-N236Y, we obtained an increase in binding affinity and stability toward both 5'-GGAA-3' and 5'-GGAT-3' containing oligonucleotides. We propose that substitution of alanine for serine introduces an oxygen atom that can accept hydrogen and interact with potential water molecules or other atoms to make an energetically favorable hydrogen bond with both 5'-GGAA-3' and 5'-GGAT-3' oligonucleotides. The free energy of dissociation for the double mutant A231S-N236Y with 5'-GGAA-3' (delta deltaG((A231S-N236Y) - (N236Y)) = -1.2 kcal mol confirm the stabilizing effect of this mutant in the protein-DNA complex formation. We conclude that N236Y mutation relaxes the specificity toward 5'-GGAA-3' and 5'-GGAT-3' sequences, while A231S mutation modulates the degree of specificity toward 5'-GGAA-3' and 5'GGAT-3' sequences. This study explains why wild-type PU.1 does not recognize 5'-GGAT-3' sequences and in addition broadens our understanding of 5'-GGAA/T-3' recognition by ETS protein family members.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10548056      PMCID: PMC2144130          DOI: 10.1110/ps.8.10.2098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  42 in total

Review 1.  Structural classification of HTH DNA-binding domains and protein-DNA interaction modes.

Authors:  R Wintjens; M Rooman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-09-20       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Pip, a lymphoid-restricted IRF, contains a regulatory domain that is important for autoinhibition and ternary complex formation with the Ets factor PU.1.

Authors:  A L Brass; E Kehrli; C F Eisenbeis; U Storb; H Singh
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  New insights on DNA recognition by ets proteins from the crystal structure of the PU.1 ETS domain-DNA complex.

Authors:  F Pio; R Kodandapani; C Z Ni; W Shepard; M Klemsz; S R McKercher; R A Maki; K R Ely
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-09-20       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Analysis of mass transport-limited binding kinetics in evanescent wave biosensors.

Authors:  P Schuck; A P Minton
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1996-09-05       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Kinetic analysis of biosensor data: elementary tests for self-consistency.

Authors:  P Schuck; A P Minton
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 13.807

6.  Kinetics of binding of Antp homeodomain to DNA analyzed by measurements of surface plasmon resonance.

Authors:  M Seimiya; Y Kurosawa
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1996-12-02       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  DNA binding by the ETS domain.

Authors:  B J Graves; M E Gillespie; L P McIntosh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The role of water in protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  J W Schwabe
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 9.  Physical basis of a protein-DNA recognition code.

Authors:  Y Choo; A Klug
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 10.  Transcriptional activation by recruitment.

Authors:  M Ptashne; A Gann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  Identification of a PU.1-IRF4 protein interaction surface predicted by chemical exchange line broadening.

Authors:  Scott R McKercher; Christian R Lombardo; Andrey Bobkov; Xin Jia; Nuria Assa-Munt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sequence discrimination by DNA-binding domain of ETS family transcription factor PU.1 is linked to specific hydration of protein-DNA interface.

Authors:  Gregory M K Poon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  RAG1 targeting in the genome is dominated by chromatin interactions mediated by the non-core regions of RAG1 and RAG2.

Authors:  Yaakov Maman; Grace Teng; Rashu Seth; Steven H Kleinstein; David G Schatz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Transition state for protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  Diego U Ferreiro; Ignacio E Sánchez; Gonzalo de Prat Gay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Probing the electrostatics and pharmacological modulation of sequence-specific binding by the DNA-binding domain of the ETS family transcription factor PU.1: a binding affinity and kinetics investigation.

Authors:  Manoj Munde; Gregory M K Poon; W David Wilson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Genomic and biochemical insights into the specificity of ETS transcription factors.

Authors:  Peter C Hollenhorst; Lawrence P McIntosh; Barbara J Graves
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Mapping interfacial hydration in ETS-family transcription factor complexes with DNA: a chimeric approach.

Authors:  Amanda V Albrecht; Hye Mi Kim; Gregory M K Poon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Energetics of the protein-DNA-water interaction.

Authors:  Francesca Spyrakis; Pietro Cozzini; Chiara Bertoli; Anna Marabotti; Glen E Kellogg; Andrea Mozzarelli
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2007-01-10

9.  IL-32θ inhibits monocytic differentiation of leukemia cells by attenuating expression of transcription factor PU.1.

Authors:  Man Sub Kim; Jeong-Woo Kang; Yun Sun Park; Dong Hun Lee; Yesol Bak; Taeho Kwon; Do-Young Yoon
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-02-28

10.  Mathematical modeling of GATA-switching for regulating the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cell.

Authors:  Tianhai Tian; Kate Smith-Miles
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2014-01-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.