OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and complications of operative laparoscopy in women with high body mass indices (BMIs). METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive patients with BMIs exceeding 30 who underwent operative laparoscopy were compared with 160 consecutive patients with BMIs of 30 or less who underwent the same procedure. Patient characteristics, ultrasound features of adnexal masses, and details of operative procedures were compared. Operative and postoperative complications, the percentage of failed laparoscopies, and length of hospital stay were compared between groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, parity, menopausal status, history of laparotomy, ultrasound features of adnexal masses, complexity of laparoscopic procedures, and the presence and degree of adhesions at the time of laparoscopy. Estimated blood loss, operative times, operative and major postoperative complications, and lengths of hospital stay also did not differ significantly between women with high BMIs and those with low BMIs (180.3 versus 151.4 mL, P = .41; 150.5 versus 146.5 minutes, P = .78; 2.1 versus 1.9%, P = .90; 2.1 versus 1.9%, P = .91; and 2.3 versus 1.9 days, P = .51, respectively). However, women with BMIs exceeding 30 had a significantly higher incidence of procedure conversion to laparotomy (14.9 versus 5.6%, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Operative laparoscopy is safe and feasible in women with high BMIs. Although there is an increased chance of procedure conversion to laparotomy in these women, the morbidity and length of hospitalization associated with the procedure are similar to those among women with low BMIs.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and complications of operative laparoscopy in women with high body mass indices (BMIs). METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive patients with BMIs exceeding 30 who underwent operative laparoscopy were compared with 160 consecutive patients with BMIs of 30 or less who underwent the same procedure. Patient characteristics, ultrasound features of adnexal masses, and details of operative procedures were compared. Operative and postoperative complications, the percentage of failed laparoscopies, and length of hospital stay were compared between groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, parity, menopausal status, history of laparotomy, ultrasound features of adnexal masses, complexity of laparoscopic procedures, and the presence and degree of adhesions at the time of laparoscopy. Estimated blood loss, operative times, operative and major postoperative complications, and lengths of hospital stay also did not differ significantly between women with high BMIs and those with low BMIs (180.3 versus 151.4 mL, P = .41; 150.5 versus 146.5 minutes, P = .78; 2.1 versus 1.9%, P = .90; 2.1 versus 1.9%, P = .91; and 2.3 versus 1.9 days, P = .51, respectively). However, women with BMIs exceeding 30 had a significantly higher incidence of procedure conversion to laparotomy (14.9 versus 5.6%, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Operative laparoscopy is safe and feasible in women with high BMIs. Although there is an increased chance of procedure conversion to laparotomy in these women, the morbidity and length of hospitalization associated with the procedure are similar to those among women with low BMIs.
Authors: Marcello Ceccaroni; Giovanni Roviglione; Anna Pesci; Sara Quintana; Francesco Bruni; Roberto Clarizia Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2014-05-26 Impact factor: 1.195