Literature DB >> 10543011

In vivo evaluation of coralline hydroxyapatite and direct current electrical stimulation in lumbar spinal fusion.

K J Bozic1, P A Glazer, D Zurakowski, B J Simon, S J Lipson, W C Hayes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An animal model of posterolateral intertransverse process lumbar spinal fusion using autologous bone, coralline hydroxyapatite, and/or direct current electrical stimulation.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of an osteoconductive bone graft substitute and direct-current electrical stimulation on the rate of pseudarthrosis in a rabbit spinal fusion model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Conventional techniques for the surgical treatment of degenerative conditions in the lumbar spine have a substantial failure rate and associated morbidity. Bone graft substitutes and electrical stimulation are alternative techniques to enhance fusion rates and limit the morbidity associated with posterolateral intertransverse process fusion using autologous iliac crest bone graft.
METHODS: Fifty-three adult female New Zealand White rabbits underwent single-level lumbar posterolateral intertransverse process fusion. Animals were assigned to one of four groups using either autologous bone (Group I), coralline hydroxyapatite with autologous bone marrow aspirate (Group II), coralline hydroxyapatite with a 40-microA implantable direct current electrical stimulator and bone marrow aspirate (Group III), or coralline hydroxyapatite with a 100-microA implantable direct current electrical stimulator and bone marrow aspirate (Group IV). Animals were killed at 8 weeks, and fused motion segments were subjected to manual palpation, mechanical testing, and radiographic and histologic analysis to assess the fusion mass.
RESULTS: Successful fusion was achieved in 57% (8/14) of animals in Group I, 25% (3/12) in Group II, 50% (6/12) in Group III, and 87% (13/15) in Group IV. Mean stiffness and ultimate load to failure were significantly higher in Group IV than in all other groups (P < 0.05). Histologic analysis demonstrated a qualitative increase in fusion mass in Group IV versus all other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct-current electrical stimulation increased fusion rates in a dose-dependent manner in a rabbit spinal fusion model. Coralline hydroxyapatite is an osteoconductive bone graft substitute, and thus requires an osteoinductive stimulus to ensure reliable fusion rates. Furthermore, coralline hydroxyapatite and direct current electrical stimulation can be used together to increase fusion rates in a rabbit spinal fusion model while avoiding the morbidity associated with harvesting iliac crest bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10543011     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199910150-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  New algorithm to control a cycle ergometer using electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J S Petrofsky
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Spinal fusion using an autologous growth factor gel and a porous resorbable ceramic.

Authors:  William R Walsh; Andreas Loefler; Sean Nicklin; Doug Arm; Ralph E Stanford; Yan Yu; Richard Harris; R M Gillies
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Vertebral growth modulation by electrical current in an animal model: potential treatment for scoliosis.

Authors:  George R Dodge; J Richard Bowen; Changhoon Jeong
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  Mechanical characterisation of a bone defect model filled with ceramic cements.

Authors:  A Gisep; S Kugler; D Wahl; B Rahn
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Electrical stimulation therapies for spinal fusions: current concepts.

Authors:  Jean C Gan; Paul A Glazer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Mesenchymal stem cell osteodifferentiation in response to alternating electric current.

Authors:  Courtney M Creecy; Christine F O'Neill; Bernard P Arulanandam; Victor L Sylvia; Christopher S Navara; Rena Bizios
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Histological Evaluation of Hydroxyapatite Granules with and without Platelet-Rich Plasma versus an Autologous Bone Graft: Comparative study of biomaterials used for spinal fusion in a New Zealand white rabbit model.

Authors:  Zamzuri Zakaria; Che N Z C Seman; Zunariah Buyong; Mohd A Sharifudin; Ahmad H Zulkifly; Kamarul A Khalid
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2016-11-30

8.  Assessment of SiCaP-30 in a Rabbit Posterolateral Fusion Model with Concurrent Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Joseph D Smucker; Emily B Petersen; Ali Al-Hili; James V Nepola; Douglas C Fredericks
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

9.  Posterolateral spinal fusion in a rabbit model using a collagen-mineral composite bone graft substitute.

Authors:  William Robert Walsh; F Vizesi; G B Cornwall; D Bell; R Oliver; Y Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Assessment of Mastergraft(®) strip with bone marrow aspirate as a graft extender in a rabbit posterolateral fusion model.

Authors:  Joseph D Smucker; Emily B Petersen; James V Nepola; Douglas C Fredericks
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.