Literature DB >> 26361457

Assessment of SiCaP-30 in a Rabbit Posterolateral Fusion Model with Concurrent Chemotherapy.

Joseph D Smucker1, Emily B Petersen1, Ali Al-Hili1, James V Nepola1, Douglas C Fredericks1.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy derivatives of the rabbit posterolateral fusion model are considered a challenging environment in which to test bone graft materials. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance characteristics of SiCaP-30 as a bone graft substitute relative to autograft (iliac crest bone graft [ICBG]), Actifuse ABX and β-Tricalcium Phosphate-Bioactive Glass-Type I Collagen (βTCP-BG) in a rabbit posterolateral spine fusion model with concurrent chemotherapy treatment This was a randomized, controlled study in a laboratory setting with blinded assessment of fusion by manual palpation and flexibility testing. Sixty rabbits were entered into the study with 45 used for analysis. Chemotherapeutic agents, doxorubicin and cis-platin (2.5 mg/kg), were administered one week prior to surgery, and one, two and three weeks post surgery. Bilateral posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process fusions were performed at L5-L6. The lateral two thirds of the transverse processes were decorticated and covered with 3cc/side of one of the following graft materials: autologous ICBG, Actifuse ABX (ApaTech Ltd, UK), Vitoss BA (Orthovita, USA) or SiCaP-30 (ApaTech Ltd., UK). Animals were euthanized 12 weeks post surgery. The ICBG group had a 45% (5/11) manual palpation fusion rate and correlated with motion analysis fusion results of 36% (4/11). The Actifuse ABX group had a 33% (4/12) manual palpation fusion rate and a motion analysis fusion rate of 25% (3/12). No motion segments in the Vitoss BA group (0/11) showed any signs of fusion. The SiCaP-30 group demonstrated a statistically higher manual palpation and motion analysis fusion rate of 82% (9/11; p<0.05) and produced superior bone formation compared with Actifuse ABX and βTCP-BG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SiCaP-30; bone substitute; lumbar spine; posterolateral fusion; silicate-substitute

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26361457      PMCID: PMC4492144     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  34 in total

1.  Competitive protein adsorption as observed by surface plasmon resonance.

Authors:  R J Green; M C Davies; C J Roberts; S J Tendler
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Bone repair in the twenty-first century: biology, chemistry or engineering?

Authors:  Karin A Hing
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Microporosity enhances bioactivity of synthetic bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  K A Hing; B Annaz; S Saeed; P A Revell; T Buckland
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Physico-chemical characteristics and protein adsorption potential of hydroxyapatite particles: influence on in vitro biocompatibility of ceramics after sintering.

Authors:  M Rouahi; E Champion; O Gallet; A Jada; K Anselme
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.268

5.  Effect of silicon level on rate, quality and progression of bone healing within silicate-substituted porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds.

Authors:  Karin A Hing; Peter A Revell; Nigel Smith; Thomas Buckland
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  In vivo evaluation of a resorbable osteoinductive composite as a graft substitute for lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  S D Boden; J H Schimandle; W C Hutton; C J Damien; J J Benedict; C Baranowski; S Collier
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-02

7.  The use of coralline hydroxyapatite with bone marrow, autogenous bone graft, or osteoinductive bone protein extract for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  S D Boden; G J Martin; M Morone; J L Ugbo; L Titus; W C Hutton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Use of a collagen-hydroxyapatite matrix in spinal fusion. A rabbit model.

Authors:  B K Tay; A X Le; M Heilman; J Lotz; D S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Lumbar intertransverse-process spinal arthrodesis with use of a bovine bone-derived osteoinductive protein. A preliminary report.

Authors:  S D Boden; J H Schimandle; W C Hutton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The effects of doxorubicin (adriamycin) on spinal fusion: an experimental model of posterolateral lumbar spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  P Justin Tortolani; Andrew E Park; John Louis-Ugbo; Emad S Attallah-Wasef; Chaiwat Kraiwattanapong; John G Heller; Scott D Boden; S Tim Yoon
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  3 in total

1.  Electrospun PLGA and β-TCP (Rebossis-85) in a Lapine Posterolateral Fusion Model.

Authors:  J Christopher Nepola; Emily B Petersen; Nicole DeVries-Watson; Nicole Grosland; Douglas C Fredericks
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

2.  Evaluation of an increased strut porosity silicate-substituted calcium phosphate, SiCaP EP, as a synthetic bone graft substitute in spinal fusion surgery: a prospective, open-label study.

Authors:  Ciaran Bolger; Drew Jones; Steven Czop
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A novel tissue-engineered bone graft composed of silicon-substituted calcium phosphate, autogenous fine particulate bone powder and BMSCs promotes posterolateral spinal fusion in rabbits.

Authors:  LiHuang Cui; ShouYang Xiang; DeChun Chen; Rui Fu; Xin Zhang; JingTao Chen; XinTao Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.191

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.