OBJECT: In this paper the authors demonstrate the concordance between magnetic source (MS) imaging and direct cortical stimulation for mapping receptive language cortex. METHODS: In 13 consecutive surgical patients, cortex specialized for receptive language functions was identified noninvasively by obtaining activation maps aided by MS imaging in the context of visual and auditory word-recognition tasks. Surgery was then performed for treatment of medically intractable seizure disorder (eight patients), and for resection of tumor (four), or angioma (one). Mapping of language areas with cortical stimulation was performed intraoperatively in 10 patients and extraoperatively in three. Cortical stimulation mapping verified the accuracy of the MS imaging-based localization in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Information provided by MS imaging can be especially helpful in cases of atypical language representation, including bihemispheric representation, and location of language in areas other than those expected within the dominant hemisphere, such as the anterior portion of the superior temporal gyrus, the posteroinferior portion of the middle temporal gyrus, the basal temporal cortex, and the lateral temporooccipital cortex.
OBJECT: In this paper the authors demonstrate the concordance between magnetic source (MS) imaging and direct cortical stimulation for mapping receptive language cortex. METHODS: In 13 consecutive surgical patients, cortex specialized for receptive language functions was identified noninvasively by obtaining activation maps aided by MS imaging in the context of visual and auditory word-recognition tasks. Surgery was then performed for treatment of medically intractable seizure disorder (eight patients), and for resection of tumor (four), or angioma (one). Mapping of language areas with cortical stimulation was performed intraoperatively in 10 patients and extraoperatively in three. Cortical stimulation mapping verified the accuracy of the MS imaging-based localization in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Information provided by MS imaging can be especially helpful in cases of atypical language representation, including bihemispheric representation, and location of language in areas other than those expected within the dominant hemisphere, such as the anterior portion of the superior temporal gyrus, the posteroinferior portion of the middle temporal gyrus, the basal temporal cortex, and the lateral temporooccipital cortex.
Authors: Andrew C Papanicolaou; Panagiotis G Simos; Eduardo M Castillo; Joshua I Breier; Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright Journal: Learn Mem Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.460
Authors: Tony W Wilson; Arthur C Leuthold; Scott M Lewis; Apostolos P Georgopoulos; Patricia J Pardo Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2004-10-23 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Tony W Wilson; Arthur C Leuthold; Scott M Lewis; Apostolos P Georgopoulos; Patricia J Pardo Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Tai-Li Chou; James R Booth; Tali Bitan; Douglas D Burman; Jordan D Bigio; Nadia E Cone; Dong Lu; Fan Cao Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Richard C Burgess; Michael E Funke; Susan M Bowyer; Jeffrey D Lewine; Heidi E Kirsch; Anto I Bagić Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: F Maestú; J Arrazola; A Fernández; P G Simos; C Amo; P Gil-Gregorio; S Fernandez; A Papanicolaou; T Ortiz Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 10.154