Literature DB >> 10541127

Prospective randomized comparison of valved versus nonvalved peripherally inserted central vein catheters.

E K Hoffer1, J Borsa, P Santulli, R Bloch, A B Fontaine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a valved peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) design would result in a lower incidence of occlusion, infection, and malfunction than a clamped catheter. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three hundred sixty-two study patients (233 men, 129 women; mean age, 44 years) were randomized to receive a clamped (n = 182) or valved (n = 180) 5-French single-lumen PICC. Catheters were placed under fluoroscopic (n = 331) or sonographic guidance (n = 31). The valved PICC was flushed with saline solution, and the clamped PICC was flushed with a heparin-saline solution. All patients were prospectively followed up at least weekly for catheter status and complications.
RESULTS: Percutaneous placement with the catheter tip in the central veins was successful in 99% of patients. Mean dwell time was 34 days. Twenty-six occlusive or infectious complications occurred in the clamped catheter group and 12 in the valved catheter group (p = .02). The clamped and valved catheter groups had 13 and five occlusions, respectively (p = .06), and 12 and five catheter-related blood stream infections, respectively (p = .09). Most occlusions (68%) were treated successfully with urokinase, and site infection or sepsis was treated by catheter removal.
CONCLUSION: We found a statistically significant difference in the complication rate for the valved PICC compared with the clamped PICC. With the valved PICC, occlusion and infection were reduced, and patients having these catheters did not require heparin flushes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10541127     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.5.10541127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  A randomized trial of valved vs nonvalved implantable ports for vascular access.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Lamont; Todd M McCarty; Jeffrey S Stephens; Bruce A Smith; John Carlo; Sheryl Livingston; Joseph A Kuhn
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-10

Review 2.  Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.

Authors:  Eduardo López-Briz; Vicente Ruiz Garcia; Juan B Cabello; Sylvia Bort-Martí; Rafael Carbonell Sanchis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 3.  ECG-Based Techniques to Optimize Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Rationale for Tip Positioning and Practical Use.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gullo; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Efficacy of multifaceted interventions in reducing complications of peripherally inserted central catheter in adult oncology patients.

Authors:  Geng Tian; Yan Zhu; Li Qi; Fengqin Guo; Haidan Xu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Flushing and Locking of Venous Catheters: Available Evidence and Evidence Deficit.

Authors:  Godelieve Alice Goossens
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-14

6.  Incidence of and factors associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in patients with advanced solid tumors on home parenteral nutrition managed using a standardized catheter care protocol.

Authors:  Pankaj G Vashi; Natasha Virginkar; Brenten Popiel; Persis Edwin; Digant Gupta
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 7.  Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.

Authors:  Eduardo López-Briz; Vicente Ruiz Garcia; Juan B Cabello; Sylvia Bort-Martí; Rafael Carbonell Sanchis; Amanda Burls
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-30

Review 8.  Reducing the risk of infection associated with vascular access devices through nanotechnology: a perspective.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Samantha Keogh; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-11-21

9. 

Authors:  Marcelo Kalil Di Santo; Diogo Takemoto; Robert Guimarães Nascimento; Ariele Milano Nascimento; Érika Siqueira; Caio Túlio Duarte; Marco Antônio Caldas Jovino; Jorge Agle Kalil
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.