Literature DB >> 10540697

How accurately do we estimate patients' weight in emergency departments?

C M Fernandes1, S Clark, A Price, G Innes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of estimates of patients' weight made by physicians, nurses, and patients themselves in emergency departments.
DESIGN: Observational prospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral centre in Vancouver, BC. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven attending physicians, 26 nurses, and a convenience sample of 117 patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients themselves, attending physicians, and nurses independently estimated the weight of 117 patients. An investigator weighed each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean error was determined by subtracting actual weight from estimated weight and dividing by actual weight; 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
RESULTS: Mean error in estimates was 3.1% (95% CI 2.7 to 3.5) for patients, 8.4% for nurses (CI 7.6 to 9.2), and 8.1% (CI 7.1 to 9.1) for physicians. Weight was estimated within 5% of actual weight by 32% of nurses, 39% of physicians, and 82% of patients. Weight was estimated within 10% of actual weight by 66% of nurses, 66% of physicians, and 97% of patients. Estimates out by more than 15% were made by 11% of nurses, 16% of physicians, and 1% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient estimates were most accurate. Physician and nurse estimates were unreliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10540697      PMCID: PMC2328636     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  9 in total

1.  Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification of height, weight and body mass index based on questionnaire data.

Authors:  G Boström; F Diderichsen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Analysis of parental estimates of children's weights in the ED.

Authors:  S Leffler; M Hayes
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 3.  The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality.

Authors:  M R Chassin; R W Galvin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  R D Hull; G E Raskob; J Hirsh; R M Jay; J R Leclerc; W H Geerts; D Rosenbloom; D L Sackett; C Anderson; L Harrison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  T M Hyers; R D Hull; J G Weg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  The weights and heights of Mexican-American adolescents: the accuracy of self-reports.

Authors:  H Davis; P J Gergen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Validity of self-reported weight--a study of urban Brazilian adults.

Authors:  M I Schmidt; B B Duncan; M Tavares; C A Polanczyk; L Pellanda; P M Zimmer
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.106

8.  Body weight estimation of elderly patients by nomogram.

Authors:  J A Atiea; N Y Haboubi; P R Hudson; B D Sastry
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Can self-reported data accurately describe the prevalence of overweight?

Authors:  R J Roberts
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.427

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Enoxaparin dosing errors in the emergency department.

Authors:  Samantha P Jellinek-Cohen; May Li; Gregg Husk
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2018

2.  Anthropometric approximation of body weight in unresponsive stroke patients.

Authors:  M W Lorenz; M Graf; C Henke; M Hermans; U Ziemann; M Sitzer; C Foerch
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Seeing under the cover with a 3D U-Net: point cloud-based weight estimation of covered patients.

Authors:  Alexander Bigalke; Lasse Hansen; Jasper Diesel; Mattias P Heinrich
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joanna C McLaughlin; Kathryn Hamilton; Ruth Kipping
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  A new method for estimating patient body weight using CT dose modulation data.

Authors:  Dominic Gascho; Lucia Ganzoni; Philippe Kolly; Niklaus Zoelch; Gary M Hatch; Michael J Thali; Thomas D Ruder
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2017-12-04

6.  A deep-learning method using computed tomography scout images for estimating patient body weight.

Authors:  Shota Ichikawa; Misaki Hamada; Hiroyuki Sugimori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.