Literature DB >> 9279620

Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification of height, weight and body mass index based on questionnaire data.

G Boström1, F Diderichsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyse misclassification of height, weight and body mass index (BMI), derived from mail questionnaires, and its dependency on socioeconomic factors.
METHODS: A random sample of 4442 adults aged 18-84 years, living in Stockholm county, Sweden, were in 1984-1985 asked about their height and weight. A few months later 3208 of these adults participated in a health examination that included measures of height and weight. In this study we have used occupational class as the socioeconomic indicator. We have used sensitivity as a measure of misclassification of height, weight and BMI.
RESULTS: The difference in mean measured height between socioeconomic groups I and III was 2.7 cm for men and 2.0 cm for women. The mean difference in measured height between socioeconomic groups I and III was higher for men than for women in all age groups. The mean difference between self-reported and measured height was 0.6 cm for men and 0.79 cm for women. For weight, the corresponding difference was -0.74 kg for men and -1.64 kg for women. Women's BMI was more underestimated than men's (-0.85 for women, -0.40 for men). When using self-reported height and weight for calculating BMI, 81% of the men and 78% of the women were classified correctly, but only 61% of the obese men and 55% of the obese women were identified. The BMI was underestimated in all socioeconomic groups. Manual workers had a lower proportion of underweight, compared to professionals and intermediate non-manual workers, while the objective measure showed the inverse relationship. The prevalence of overweight and obesity in men was 42% higher in socioeconomic group III compared with group I with self-reported data compared with 28% when measured. Underestimation of BMI was highest among women, the obese, the elderly, and male non-manual workers and female manual workers.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that socioeconomic differences in height, when using self-reported information, involve an underestimation. This means that the height differences between socioeconomic groups in Sweden may actually be higher than that reported by individuals in surveys. The socioeconomic differences in underweight tend to be underestimated for men, as well as obesity for women, when using self-reported information. The socioeconomic differences in overweight and obesity are shown to be overestimated for men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9279620     DOI: 10.1093/ije/26.4.860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  61 in total

1.  Anthropometric measurements and body silhouette of women: validity and perception.

Authors:  B Tehard; M J van Liere; C Com Nougué; F Clavel-Chapelon
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-12

2.  Agreement between self-reported and measured height, weight and body mass index in old age--a longitudinal study with 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Anna K Dahl; Linda B Hassing; Eleonor I Fransson; Nancy L Pedersen
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Exploring the origins of asthma: Lessons from twin studies.

Authors:  Simon Francis Thomsen
Journal:  Eur Clin Respir J       Date:  2014-09-01

4.  Food insecurity and obesity: a comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight.

Authors:  Ariel-Ann Lyons; Jungwee Park; Connie H Nelson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Body mass index, physical activity, and the risk of decline in overall health and physical functioning in late middle age.

Authors:  Xiaoxing Z He; David W Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Levelling off of prevalence of obesity in the adult population of Sweden between 2000/01 and 2004/05.

Authors:  Jan Sundquist; Sven-Erik Johansson; Kristina Sundquist
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Rutegård; H Nordenstedt; Y Lu; J Lagergren; P Lagergren
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Accuracy of self-reported body weight, height and waist circumference in a Dutch overweight working population.

Authors:  Johanna C Dekkers; Marieke F van Wier; Ingrid J M Hendriksen; Jos W R Twisk; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Validity of self-reported weight, height, and body mass index among university students in Thailand: Implications for population studies of obesity in developing countries.

Authors:  Lynette Ly Lim; Sam-Ang Seubsman; Adrian Sleigh
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2009-09-25

10.  Risk of obesity in immigrants compared with Swedes in two deprived neighbourhoods.

Authors:  Johan Faskunger; Ulf Eriksson; Sven-Erik Johansson; Kristina Sundquist; Jan Sundquist
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.