PURPOSE: To differentiate prostate cancers of different histopathologic grades with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Results with a conventional small-molecular contrast medium (CM) were compared to those with a prototypic macromolecular CM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High- and low-grade tumors, sublines of the Dunning R3327 rat prostate cancer line, were subcutaneously implanted into the flanks of 12 male Copenhagen rats. Dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging was performed with small-molecular CM and macromolecular CM at an interval of 1 day. Microvascular permeability, as estimated with the endothelial transfer coefficient, and fractional plasma volume were calculated for each tumor and each CM by means of a two-compartmental, bidirectional kinetic model. RESULTS: Mean endothelial transfer coefficient values for both macromolecular CM and small-molecular CM were significantly different between the two tumor sublines (P = .0004 and P = .01, respectively). For the high- and low-grade tumors, no overlap of values was seen with macromolecular CM, but a broad overlap was seen with small-molecular CM despite a significant difference in mean values. CONCLUSION: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging permits differentiation of histopathologic prostatic tumor types. Quantitative microvascular permeability characteristics estimated from macromolecular CM-enhanced data were significantly superior to those derived from small-molecular CM-enhanced data.
PURPOSE: To differentiate prostate cancers of different histopathologic grades with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Results with a conventional small-molecular contrast medium (CM) were compared to those with a prototypic macromolecular CM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High- and low-grade tumors, sublines of the Dunning R3327 ratprostate cancer line, were subcutaneously implanted into the flanks of 12 male Copenhagen rats. Dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging was performed with small-molecular CM and macromolecular CM at an interval of 1 day. Microvascular permeability, as estimated with the endothelial transfer coefficient, and fractional plasma volume were calculated for each tumor and each CM by means of a two-compartmental, bidirectional kinetic model. RESULTS: Mean endothelial transfer coefficient values for both macromolecular CM and small-molecular CM were significantly different between the two tumor sublines (P = .0004 and P = .01, respectively). For the high- and low-grade tumors, no overlap of values was seen with macromolecular CM, but a broad overlap was seen with small-molecular CM despite a significant difference in mean values. CONCLUSION: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging permits differentiation of histopathologic prostatic tumor types. Quantitative microvascular permeability characteristics estimated from macromolecular CM-enhanced data were significantly superior to those derived from small-molecular CM-enhanced data.
Authors: Anda Preda; Viktor Novikov; Martina Möglich; Eugenia Floyd; Karl Turetschek; David M Shames; Timothy P L Roberts; Claire Corot; Wayne O Carter; Robert C Brasch Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-07-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Preda; P A Wielopolski; T L M Ten Hagen; M van Vliet; J F Veenland; G Ambagtsheer; S T van Tiel; M W Vogel; A M M Eggermont; G P Krestin; C F van Dijke Journal: MAGMA Date: 2004-10-10 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: R Jain; S K Ellika; L Scarpace; L R Schultz; J P Rock; J Gutierrez; S C Patel; J Ewing; T Mikkelsen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 3.825