Literature DB >> 10540635

Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol?

E A Sickles1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10540635     DOI： 10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc4611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN： 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification.

Authors:  S Obenauer; K P Hermann; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  [Evaluation of the results after using of the BI-RADS categories in 1,777 clinical mammograms].

Authors:  E A Hauth; K Khan; B Wolfgarten; A Betzler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Additional diagnostic value of MRI in patients with suspicious breast lesions based on ultrasound.

Authors:  O Sarica; F Uluc
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Optimal Policies for Reducing Unnecessary Follow-up Mammography Exams in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Oguzhan Alagoz; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Decis Anal       Date:  2013-09

5.  The current role of vacuum assisted breast biopsy system in breast disease.

Authors:  Hai-Lin Park; Lee Su Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.588

6.  Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.

Authors:  Janet K Baum; Lucy G Hanna; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Mary C Mahoney; Emily F Conant; Lawrence W Bassett; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: Breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; David Y Johnson; Karen S Johnson; Jay A Baker; Mary Scott Soo; E Shelley Hwang; Sujata V Ghate
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Diana L Miglioretti; Edward A Sickles; Linn Abraham; Patricia A Carney; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  Eric G Poon; Jennifer S Haas; Ann Louise Puopolo; Tejal K Gandhi; Elisabeth Burdick; David W Bates; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Appearance of breast masses on sonoelastography with special focus on the diagnosis of fibroadenomas.

Authors:  Eduardo F C Fleury; Jose F Rinaldi; Sebastiao Piato; Jose Carlos V Fleury; Decio Roveda Junior
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.315
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.