Literature DB >> 10537576

Clinical evaluation of a new in-line continuous blood gas monitor.

R Southworth1, R Sutton, S Mize, A H Stammers, L W Fristoe, D Cook, D Hostetler, W E Richenbacher.   

Abstract

Two methodologies for obtaining accurate blood gas and electrolyte values during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are traditional laboratory analyzers, which use an electrochemical technology, and continuous in-line monitoring systems, which use a fluorometric and/or spectrophotometric technology. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new continuous in-line monitor, the 3M CDI Blood Parameter Monitoring System 500, which provides continuous in-line measurements of pH, PCO2, PO2, potassium (K+), oxygen saturation, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and temperature, during partial or complete CPB. Study parameters included arterial pH, PCO2, PO2, and K+ values. Overall performance was analyzed by calculating the mean difference (expressed as the bias) between the CDI system 500 and the laboratory analyzer for each parameter. The accuracy of the arterial pH, PCO2, and K+ values provided by the CDI system 500 was then evaluated using target values established in the acceptable performance standards for laboratory analyzers from the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act of 1988 (CLIA '88). The accuracy of the PO2 value provided by the CDI system 500 was evaluated using a target value of +/- 10% of the reference, or laboratory analyzer, value. A prospective multi-center trial was conducted following Institutional Review Board approval. A total of 75 cases was included in the analyses, with over 200 data points from 4 clinical locations. Results for pH, PCO2, and K+ were within the target values established by CLIA '88. pH bias was 0.00 +/- 0.02 pH units. PCO2 bias was -0.3 +/- 3.3 mm Hg. K+ bias was approximately +0.12 +/- 0.31 mmole/l. Results for PO2 were within 10% of the reference value. PO2 bias was 7.5 +/- 13.8 mm Hg. The results of this clinical trial show that the CDI System 500 continuous in-line monitoring system provides values that meet the accuracy standards for laboratory analyzers for arterial pH, PCO2, PO2, and K+.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10537576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  8 in total

1.  In vitro comparison of the new in-line monitor BMU 40 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer.

Authors:  F Oliver Grosse; David Holzhey; Volkmar Falk; Jan Schaarschmidt; Klaus Kraemer; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2010-03

2.  Clinical evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the CDI 500 in-line blood gas monitor with and without gas calibration.

Authors:  Anne Louise Bellaiche; Peter F Nielsen; Steven Brantlov; Marianne B Møller; Michael Winterdahl
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2011-06

3.  Improving cardiopulmonary bypass: does continuous blood gas monitoring have a role to play?

Authors:  Jane Ottens; Sigrid C Tuble; Andrew J Sanderson; John L Knight; Robert A Baker
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2010-09

4.  Clinical evaluation of the ABL-77 for point-of-care analysis in the cardiovascular operating room.

Authors:  Jack S Prichard; John S French; Nestor Alvar
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2006-06

5.  Control of arterial PCO2 by somatic afferents in sheep.

Authors:  Philippe Haouzi; Bruno Chenuel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Spectrum Medical Quantum or Terumo CDI 500: Which Device Measures Hemoglobin and Oxygen Saturation Most Accurately When Compared to a Benchtop Blood Analyzer?

Authors:  James A Reagor; Zhiqian Gao; James S Tweddell
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2021-09

7.  Use of the CDI blood parameter monitoring system 500 for continuous blood gas measurement during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation simulation.

Authors:  Aaron Schreur; Scott Niles; James Ploessl
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2005-12

8.  Assessment of a continuous blood gas monitoring system in animals during circulatory stress.

Authors:  Sandro Gelsomino; Roberto Lorusso; Ugolino Livi; Stefano Romagnoli; Salvatore Mario Romano; Rocco Carella; Fabiana Lucà; Giuseppe Billè; Francesco Matteucci; Attilio Renzulli; Gil Bolotin; Giuseppe De Cicco; Pierluigi Stefàno; Jos Maessen; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.217

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.