Literature DB >> 10536746

Ethical dimensions of psychiatric research: a constructive, criterion-based approach to protocol preparation. The Research Protocol Ethics Assessment Tool (RePEAT).

L W Roberts1.   

Abstract

Preparing experimental protocols that are ethically sound, possess scientific merit, and meet institutional and national standards for human subject protections is a key responsibility of psychiatric investigators. This task has become increasingly complex due to developments in biomedical science, bioethics, and society at large. Practical and constructive approaches to help investigators in their efforts to create protocols that are ethically acceptable have nevertheless received little attention. To better address this gap, the Research Protocol Ethics Assessment Tool (RePEAT) was developed as an educational instrument to help assure that ethically important elements, including scientific design features, are explicitly addressed by investigators in their work with protocols involving human participants. The RePEAT is a brief evaluative checklist that reflects rigorous ethical standards, particularly with respect to criteria for studies that may involve individuals with compromised decisional abilities. For this reason, it may be especially beneficial as a self-assessment tool for investigators and protocol reviewers in psychiatry. To stimulate education and dialogue, this report presents the RePEAT and outlines its content, format, use, and limitations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10536746     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00146-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  9 in total

Review 1.  Turn-of-the-century ethical issues in child psychiatric research.

Authors:  L E Arnold
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Ethical considerations in psychopharmacological research involving decisionally impaired subjects.

Authors:  Donald L Rosenstein; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  A time of promise, a time of promises: ethical issues in advancing psychopharmacological research.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; John Krystal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Teaching ethics of psychopharmacology research in psychiatric residency training programs.

Authors:  Eugene V Beresin; Ross J Baldessarini; Jonathan Alpert; Jerrold Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Views of people with schizophrenia regarding aspects of research: study size and funding sources.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Teddy D Warner; Katherine Green Hammond; Jinger G Hoop
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Wessel Reijers; David Wright; Philip Brey; Karsten Weber; Rowena Rodrigues; Declan O'Sullivan; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Schizophrenia patients' and psychiatrists' perspectives on ethical aspects of symptom re-emergence during psychopharmacological research participation.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Teddy D Warner; Khanh P Nguyen; Cynthia M A Geppert; Melinda K Rogers; Brian B Roberts
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-05-17       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees.

Authors:  Rebecca H Li; Mary C Wacholtz; Mark Barnes; Liam Boggs; Susan Callery-D'Amico; Amy Davis; Alla Digilova; David Forster; Kate Heffernan; Maeve Luthin; Holly Fernandez Lynch; Lindsay McNair; Jennifer E Miller; Jacquelyn Murphy; Luann Van Campen; Mark Wilenzick; Delia Wolf; Cris Woolston; Carmen Aldinger; Barbara E Bierer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke.

Authors:  Francesco Ferrarello; Matteo Viligiardi; Mauro Di Bari
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2018-06-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.