Literature DB >> 10535955

Structure-based conformational preferences of amino acids.

P Koehl1, M Levitt.   

Abstract

Proteins can be very tolerant to amino acid substitution, even within their core. Understanding the factors responsible for this behavior is of critical importance for protein engineering and design. Mutations in proteins have been quantified in terms of the changes in stability they induce. For example, guest residues in specific secondary structures have been used as probes of conformational preferences of amino acids, yielding propensity scales. Predicting these amino acid propensities would be a good test of any new potential energy functions used to mimic protein stability. We have recently developed a protein design procedure that optimizes whole sequences for a given target conformation based on the knowledge of the template backbone and on a semiempirical potential energy function. This energy function is purely physical, including steric interactions based on a Lennard-Jones potential, electrostatics based on a Coulomb potential, and hydrophobicity in the form of an environment free energy based on accessible surface area and interatomic contact areas. Sequences designed by this procedure for 10 different proteins were analyzed to extract conformational preferences for amino acids. The resulting structure-based propensity scales show significant agreements with experimental propensity scale values, both for alpha-helices and beta-sheets. These results indicate that amino acid conformational preferences are a natural consequence of the potential energy we use. This confirms the accuracy of our potential and indicates that such preferences should not be added as a design criterion.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10535955      PMCID: PMC22969          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  60 in total

1.  Refined 1.8 A crystal structure of the lambda repressor-operator complex.

Authors:  L J Beamer; C O Pabo
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-09-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A new approach to protein fold recognition.

Authors:  D T Jones; W R Taylor; J M Thornton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Thermodynamic beta-sheet propensities measured using a zinc-finger host peptide.

Authors:  C A Kim; J M Berg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Structural basis of amino acid alpha helix propensity.

Authors:  M Blaber; X J Zhang; B W Matthews
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Engineering of stable and fast-folding sequences of model proteins.

Authors:  E I Shakhnovich; A M Gutin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy.

Authors:  B Rost; C Sander
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-07-20       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Protein secondary structure prediction using nearest-neighbor methods.

Authors:  T M Yi; E S Lander
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins.

Authors:  J Garnier; D J Osguthorpe; B Robson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1978-03-25       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Solution structure of the SH3 domain of phospholipase C-gamma.

Authors:  D Kohda; H Hatanaka; M Odaka; V Mandiyan; A Ullrich; J Schlessinger; F Inagaki
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-03-26       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Determination of alpha-helix propensity within the context of a folded protein. Sites 44 and 131 in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  M Blaber; X J Zhang; J D Lindstrom; S D Pepiot; W A Baase; B W Matthews
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-01-14       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  44 in total

1.  Persistently conserved positions in structurally similar, sequence dissimilar proteins: roles in preserving protein fold and function.

Authors:  Iddo Friedberg; Hanah Margalit
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Action-at-a-distance interactions enhance protein binding affinity.

Authors:  Brian A Joughin; David F Green; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Extrinsic interactions dominate helical propensity in coupled binding and folding of the lactose repressor protein hinge helix.

Authors:  Hongli Zhan; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen Shive Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Design of 11-residue peptides with unusual biophysical properties: induced secondary structure in the absence of water.

Authors:  Xiaoqun Mo; Yasuaki Hiromasa; Matt Warner; Ahlam N Al-Rawi; Takeo Iwamoto; Talat S Rahman; Xiuzhi Sun; John M Tomich
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  NMR solution structure, stability, and interaction of the recombinant bovine fibrinogen alphaC-domain fragment.

Authors:  Robert A Burton; Galina Tsurupa; Roy R Hantgan; Nico Tjandra; Leonid Medved
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  The effect of charge-charge interactions on the kinetics of alpha-helix formation.

Authors:  Deguo Du; Michelle R Bunagan; Feng Gai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A reexamination of correlations of amino acids with particular secondary structures.

Authors:  Sasa N Malkov; Miodrag V Zivković; Milos V Beljanski; Srdan D Stojanović; Snezana D Zarić
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 8.  Challenges in the computational design of proteins.

Authors:  María Suárez; Alfonso Jaramillo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Solvent accessible surface area approximations for rapid and accurate protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Durham; Brent Dorr; Nils Woetzel; René Staritzbichler; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Computational protein design: validation and possible relevance as a tool for homology searching and fold recognition.

Authors:  Marcel Schmidt Am Busch; Audrey Sedano; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.