Literature DB >> 10535858

Measuring colour rivalry suppression in amblyopia.

T S Hofeldt1, A J Hofeldt.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine if the colour rivalry suppression is an index of the visual impairment in amblyopia and if the stereopsis and fusion evaluator (SAFE) instrument is a reliable indicator of the difference in visual input from the two eyes.
METHODS: To test the accuracy of the SAFE instrument for measuring the visual input from the two eyes, colour rivalry suppression was measured in six normal subjects. A test neutral density filter (NDF) was placed before one eye to induce a temporary relative afferent defect and the subject selected the NDF before the fellow eye to neutralise the test NDF. In a non-paediatric private practice, 24 consecutive patients diagnosed with unilateral amblyopia were tested with the SAFE. Of the 24 amblyopes, 14 qualified for the study because they were able to fuse images and had no comorbid disease. The relation between depth of colour rivalry suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular difference in logMAR acuity was analysed.
RESULTS: In normal subjects, the SAFE instrument reversed temporary defects of 0.3 to 1. 8 log units to within 0.6 log units. In amblyopes, the NDF to reverse colour rivalry suppression was positively related to interocular difference in logMAR acuity (beta=1.21, p<0.0001), and negatively related to stereoacuity (beta=-0.16, p=0.019). The interocular difference in logMAR acuity was negatively related to stereoacuity (beta=-0.13, p=0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Colour rivalry suppression as measured with the SAFE was found to agree closely with the degree of visual acuity impairment in non-paediatric patients with amblyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10535858      PMCID: PMC1722877          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.83.11.1283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  14 in total

1.  Color and luminance vision in human amblyopia: shifts in isoluminance, contrast sensitivity losses, and positional deficits.

Authors:  K T Mullen; M J Sankeralli; R F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Is amblyopia an impediment to binocular function?

Authors:  R F Hess
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Fusional suppression in normal and stereoanomalous observers.

Authors:  S P McKee; R A Harrad
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Automated perimetry in amblyopia: a generalized depression.

Authors:  S P Donahue; M Wall; K E Kutzko; R H Kardon
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  The electrical response in retina and occipital cortex following photic stimulation of normal and amblyopic eyes.

Authors:  I Nawratzki; E Auerbach; H Rowe
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Pupillary defects in amblyopia.

Authors:  J Z Portnoy; H S Thompson; L Lennarson; J J Corbett
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 7.  Amblyopia.

Authors:  E Campos
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  The relative afferent pupillary defect and a novel method of fusion recovery with the Worth 4-dot test.

Authors:  L N Johnson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-02

9.  Visual acuity, its development and amblyopia.

Authors:  H Ikeda
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Afferent pupillary defects in amblyopia.

Authors:  M J Greenwald; E R Folk
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.