Literature DB >> 10535635

Feature selection with limited datasets.

M A Kupinski1, M L Giger.   

Abstract

Computer-aided diagnosis has the potential of increasing diagnostic accuracy by providing a second reading to radiologists. In many computerized schemes, numerous features can be extracted to describe suspect image regions. A subset of these features is then employed in a data classifier to determine whether the suspect region is abnormal or normal. Different subsets of features will, in general, result in different classification performances. A feature selection method is often used to determine an "optimal" subset of features to use with a particular classifier. A classifier performance measure (such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) must be incorporated into this feature selection process. With limited datasets, however, there is a distribution in the classifier performance measure for a given classifier and subset of features. In this paper, we investigate the variation in the selected subset of "optimal" features as compared with the true optimal subset of features caused by this distribution of classifier performance. We consider examples in which the probability that the optimal subset of features is selected can be analytically computed. We show the dependence of this probability on the dataset sample size, the total number of features from which to select, the number of features selected, and the performance of the true optimal subset. Once a subset of features has been selected, the parameters of the data classifier must be determined. We show that, with limited datasets and/or a large number of features from which to choose, bias is introduced if the classifier parameters are determined using the same data that were employed to select the "optimal" subset of features.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10535635     DOI: 10.1118/1.598821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa; M L Giger; J M Boone; K K Lindfors; K Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluating imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis devices at the FDA.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Heang-Ping Chan; Carl J D'Orsi; Lori E Dodd; Maryellen L Giger; David Gur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Charles E Metz; Kyle J Myers; Nancy A Obuchowski; Berkman Sahiner; Alicia Y Toledano; Margarita L Zuley
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Potential of computer-aided diagnosis of high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MRI in the classification of breast lesions.

Authors:  Neha Bhooshan; Maryellen Giger; Milica Medved; Hui Li; Abbie Wood; Yading Yuan; Li Lan; Angelica Marquez; Greg Karczmar; Gillian Newstead
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Exploring nonlinear feature space dimension reduction and data representation in breast Cadx with Laplacian eigenmaps and t-SNE.

Authors:  Andrew R Jamieson; Maryellen L Giger; Karen Drukker; Hui Li; Yading Yuan; Neha Bhooshan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Enhancement of breast CADx with unlabeled data.

Authors:  Andrew R Jamieson; Maryellen L Giger; Karen Drukker; Lorenzo L Pesce
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Ge; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Chuan Zhou; Yi-Ta Wu; Chintana Paramagul; Yiheng Zhang
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging signal and texture features for the prediction of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease progression.

Authors:  Antonio Martinez-Torteya; Juan Rodriguez-Rojas; José M Celaya-Padilla; Jorge I Galván-Tejada; Victor Treviño; Jose Tamez-Peña
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-09-15

9.  Computerized assessment of breast lesion malignancy using DCE-MRI robustness study on two independent clinical datasets from two manufacturers.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Gillian M Newstead; Ulrich Bick; Sanaz A Jansen; Hui Li; Li Lan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Xingwei Wang; Dror Lederman; Jun Tan; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.