Literature DB >> 10534464

Reference chart derived from post-stent-implantation intravascular ultrasound predictors of 6-month expected restenosis on quantitative coronary angiography.

P J de Feyter1, P Kay, C Disco, P W Serruys.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stent implantation and the availability of a reference chart to predict the expected in-stent restenosis rate based on operator-dependent IVUS parameters may interactively facilitate optimal stent placement. The use of IVUS guidance protects against undue risks of dissection or rupture. METHODS AND
RESULTS: IVUS-determined post-stent-implantation predictors of 6-month in-stent restenosis on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were identified by logistic regression analysis. These predictors were used to construct a reference chart that predicts the expected 6-month QCA restenosis rate. IVUS and QCA data were obtained from 3 registries (MUSIC [Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries study], WEST-II [West European Stent Trial II], and ESSEX [European Scimed Stent EXperience]) and 2 randomized in-stent restenosis trials (ERASER [Evaluation of ReoPro And Stenting to Eliminate Restenosis] and TRAPIST [TRApidil vs placebo to Prevent In-STent intimal hyperplasia]). In-stent restenosis was defined as luminal diameter stenosis >50% by QCA. IVUS predictors were minimum and mean in-stent area, stent length, and in-stent diameter. Multiple models were constructed with multivariate logistic regression analysis. The model containing minimum in-stent area and stent length best fit the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. This model was used to construct a reference chart to calculate the expected 6-month restenosis rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The expected 6-month in-stent restenosis rate after stent implantation for short lesions in relatively large vessels can be predicted by use of in-stent minimal area (which is inversely related to restenosis) and stent length (which is directly related to restenosis), both of which can be read from a simple reference chart.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10534464     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.17.1777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  18 in total

1.  Cobalt-chromium stents in long lesions of large vessels: clinical and angiographic results.

Authors:  Iñigo Lozano; Carlos Cuellas; Pablo Avanzas; Armando Pérez de Prado; Concepción Suárez; Juan Rondan; Daehyun Lee; Jesus M de la Hera; Felipe Fernández; César Morís
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

2.  The Sirolimus-eluting coronary stent in daily routine practice in Germany: trends in indications over the years. Results from the prospective multi-centre German Cypher Stent Registry.

Authors:  Ralf Zahn; C W Hamm; S Schneider; U Zeymer; G Richardt; M Kelm; B Levenson; T Bonzel; U Tebbe; G Sabin; C A Nienaber; Thomas Pfannebecker; J Senges
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Predictors of acute scaffold recoil after implantation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: an optical coherence tomography assessment in native coronary arteries.

Authors:  Takao Sato; John Jose; Mohamed El-Mawardy; Dmitriy S Sulimov; Ralph Tölg; Gert Richardt; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Compliance charts to guide non-complex small artery stenting: validation by quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; J Kimberly Haladyn; Debbie M Smith; Richard Lim
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2013-05-31

5.  Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Andres Vasquez; Neville Mistry; Jasvindar Singh
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-08

6.  Impact of intravascular ultrasound findings on long-term patency after self-expanding nitinol stent implantation in the iliac artery lesion.

Authors:  Kojiro Miki; Kenichi Fujii; Masashi Fukunaga; Machiko Nishimura; Tetsuo Horimatsu; Ten Saita; Hiroto Tamaru; Takahiro Imanaka; Masahiko Shibuya; Yoshiro Naito; Tohru Masuyama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Coronary artery stretch versus deep injury in the development of in-stent neointima.

Authors:  J Gunn; N Arnold; K H Chan; L Shepherd; D C Cumberland; D C Crossman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  IVUS-Guided Stent Implantation to Improve Outcome: A Promise Waiting to be Fulfilled.

Authors:  Renata Rogacka; Azeem Latib; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-05

9.  Clinical and angiographic features of small vessel stenting in the drug-eluting stent era.

Authors:  Refat Jabara; Marc Gradman; Jack P Chen; Spencer B King; Radhika Gadesam; Nicolas A F Chronos
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Restenosis begets restenosis: implications for stent selection.

Authors:  J S Wijpkema; R L Anthonio; G A J Jessurun; W A Dijk; R A Tio; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.