Literature DB >> 10530582

Clinical significance of enteroviruses in serious summer febrile illnesses of children.

H A Rotbart1, G H McCracken, R J Whitley, J F Modlin, M Cascino, S Shah, D Blum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enteroviruses are common causes of aseptic meningitis and nonspecific febrile illnesses in young children. During the summer-fall months, enterovirus-infected children are frequently evaluated in emergency room settings to rule out bacterial sepsis and/or meningitis.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the clinical significance of enterovirus infections in children evaluated for serious febrile illnesses in pediatric emergency rooms during the summer-fall season.
METHODS: Children admitted to emergency rooms at four university teaching hospitals during a single summer-fall season who required blood culture and/or lumbar puncture to rule out bacterial sepsis/meningitis were prospectively studied. An extensive questionnaire was administered, and specimens of cerebrospinal fluid, serum, urine and throat were tested for enteroviruses by viral culture and PCR. Patients were followed to determine the duration, management and outcome of their illnesses.
RESULTS: Of 203 patients studied 173 had no apparent explanation for their illness (e.g. bacterial sepsis, bacterial urinary tract infection, etc.). Of those 173 patients 79 (46%) were infected with enteroviruses, including 33 of 47 (70%) patients with aseptic meningitis, 13 of 25 (52%) patients with nonspecific febrile episodes and 33 of 101 (33%) patients with fever and focal findings (P < 0.0001 for aseptic meningitis vs. fever and focal findings; P = 0.0001 for aseptic meningitis vs. combined nonspecific febrile episodes and fever/focal patients). Among 119 hospitalized patients 65 (55%) were enterovirus-infected. Children < or =90 days of age were more likely to be enterovirus-infected (66 of 122; 54%) than children older than 90 days (13 of 51; 25%) (P = 0.0001). Enterovirus-infected children were more likely to be hospitalized as a result of the current emergency room visit (65 of 79 vs. 54 of 94; P = 0.0005) and were more likely to have had an additional hospitalization for the same illness (10 of 79 vs. 1 of 94; P = 0.003). Enterovirus-infected patients also had a shorter period from illness onset to presentation. Enterovirus-infected children were indistinguishable from those without enterovirus infection in their symptoms at onset, signs at presentation and total duration of illness (>7 days in both groups). Enterovirus-infected children were almost all treated with antibiotics (78 of 79; 99%), with 74 of 79 (94%) receiving parenteral antibiotics for a mean of 3.6 days.
CONCLUSIONS: During the summer-fall months, 39% (79 of 203) of children for whom blood cultures and/or lumbar punctures were performed for suspected bacterial infection had enterovirus infection identified as the only explanation for their illness. Of those patients with no alternative diagnosis, enterovirus infection was confirmed in 46% (79 of 179). The majority of those patients requiring hospitalization were infected with enteroviruses. The use of PCR increases the number of children for whom a specific etiology of illness can be determined and may in the future reduce the hospitalization and use of unnecessary antibiotics in patients with enterovirus infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10530582     DOI: 10.1097/00006454-199910000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J        ISSN: 0891-3668            Impact factor:   2.129


  14 in total

1.  Enteroviral meningitis with a petechial rash in three children.

Authors:  Räm N Sukhai; Rendel Munneke
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Comparison of the NucliSens Basic kit (Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification) and the Argene Biosoft Enterovirus Consensus Reverse Transcription-PCR assays for rapid detection of enterovirus RNA in clinical specimens.

Authors:  Marie L Landry; Robin Garner; David Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid and sensitive routine detection of all members of the genus enterovirus in different clinical specimens by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Monique Nijhuis; Noortje van Maarseveen; Rob Schuurman; Sandra Verkuijlen; Machiel de Vos; Karin Hendriksen; Anton M van Loon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing.

Authors:  M J Espy; J R Uhl; L M Sloan; S P Buckwalter; M F Jones; E A Vetter; J D C Yao; N L Wengenack; J E Rosenblatt; F R Cockerill; T F Smith
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Evaluation of the precision of emergency department diagnoses in young children with fever.

Authors:  Joshua M Colvin; David M Jaffe; Jared T Muenzer
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  Nonpolio enterovirus infection in the neonate and young infant.

Authors:  Michael T Hawkes; Wendy Vaudry
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 7.  Molecular methods for diagnosis of viral encephalitis.

Authors:  Roberta L Debiasi; Kenneth L Tyler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Detection of viruses in young children with fever without an apparent source.

Authors:  Joshua M Colvin; Jared T Muenzer; David M Jaffe; Avraham Smason; Elena Deych; William D Shannon; Max Q Arens; Richard S Buller; Wai-Ming Lee; Erica J Sodergren Weinstock; George M Weinstock; Gregory A Storch
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Presentation, diagnosis, and management of enterovirus infections in neonates.

Authors:  Mark J Abzug
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  Detection of echovirus 18 in human breast milk.

Authors:  Marcela V Maus; Michael A Posencheg; Kristin Geddes; Michael Elkan; Silvia Peñaranda; M Steven Oberste; Richard L Hodinka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.