Literature DB >> 10530561

Pathologic prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a follow-up study of 74 patients with or without preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

C M Torres1, H H Wang, J R Turner, W Richards, D Sugarbaker, A Shahsafaei, R D Odze.   

Abstract

One of the primary goals of pathologic examination of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma resection specimens is to provide information regarding morphologic features which can help prognosticate and guide management of affected patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic utility of a variety of histopathologic prognostic factors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with and without preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy (chemrad). Multiple clinical and histologic features such as peri-tumoral lymphocytic infiltrate, Crohn's-like lymphoid reaction, degree of residual tumor, mitosis per 1000 cells, tumor differentiation, lymphatic/vascular invasion, perineural invasion, desmoplastic reaction, and tumor growth pattern were evaluated in patients with (53) and without (21) preoperative chemrad and correlated with survival (mean follow-up, 25 mo). Data were analyzed for the entire cohort and for each separate treatment group by univariate and multivariate analysis. Patients who received chemrad showed no significant survival benefit (hazard ratio = 2.5, P = .10). In the whole cohort of patients, higher pathologic stage (P = .04), poor tumor differentiation (P = .003), increased mitotic count (P = .005), perineural invasion (P = .01), lymphatic/vascular invasion (P = .002), tumor size (P = .05), and absence of a Crohn's-like lymphoid reaction (P = .05) were significantly associated with poor survival by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, poor tumor differentiation (P = .005), high mitotic count (P = .01), and vascular invasion (P = .03) were important prognostic features, independent of pathologic stage, for the entire cohort. In the chemrad group only, tumor size (in patients with macroscopic residual tumor) (P = .05), lymph node metastasis (P = .03), mitotic count (P = .01), and lymphatic/vascular invasion (P = .02) were significant prognostic indicators by univariate analysis. Upon multivariate analysis, only lymphatic/vascular invasion (P = .02) and mitotic rate (P = .01) were independent predictors of survival. In the nonchemrad group, only tumor differentiation was significant by both univariate (P = .008) and multivariate analysis (P = .03). The differences in pathologic prognostic factors between chemrad and nonchemrad treated cases suggests that chemrad has a significant effect on the biologic properties of these tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10530561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  12 in total

1.  Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hai-Xia Qu; Li-Ping Zhao; Shu-Hui Zhan; Chang-Xin Geng; Lin Xu; Yong-Ning Xin; Xiang-Jun Jiang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The status of perineural invasion predicts the outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhong-Hua Ning; Wei Zhao; Xiao-Dong Li; Lu-Jun Chen; Bin Xu; Wen-Dong Gu; Ying-Jie Shao; Yun Xu; Jin Huang; Hong-Lei Pei; Jing-Ting Jiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 3.  [Grading of tumors in the tubular digestive tract : Esophagus, stomach, colon and rectum].

Authors:  H Bläker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Prognostic significance of the pN classification supplemented by vascular invasion for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chong-Mei Zhu; Yi-Hong Ling; Shao-Yan Xi; Rong-Zhen Luo; Jie-Wei Chen; Jing-Ping Yun; Dan Xie; Mu-Yan Cai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Prognostic Value of Perineural Invasion in Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Aiqin Gao; Linlin Wang; Juan Li; Hongyu Li; Yali Han; Xiaoxia Ma; Yuping Sun
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.434

6.  Decoy Receptor 3 (DcR3) as a Biomarker of Tumor Deterioration in Female Reproductive Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mengtong Jiang; Xiaomiao Lin; Rongquan He; Xinggu Lin; Lu Liang; Ruixue Tang; Dandan Xiong; Kanglai Wei; Yiwu Dang; Zhenbo Feng; Gang Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-06-01

7.  FAK overexpression is correlated with tumour invasiveness and lymph node metastasis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  T Miyazaki; H Kato; M Nakajima; M Sohda; Y Fukai; N Masuda; R Manda; M Fukuchi; K Tsukada; H Kuwano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The prognostic effect of perineural invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jie-Wei Chen; Jing-Dun Xie; Yi-Hong Ling; Peng Li; Shu-Mei Yan; Shao-Yan Xi; Rong-Zhen Luo; Jing-Ping Yun; Dan Xie; Mu-Yan Cai
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Activating transcription factor 4 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invasion and metastasis in mice and is associated with poor prognosis in human patients.

Authors:  Hongwu Zhu; Xiong Chen; Bin Chen; Bei Chen; Weibing Song; Dayong Sun; Yagang Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perineural invasion correlates with postoperative distant metastasis and poor overall survival in patients with PT1-3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Liming Sheng; Yongling Ji; Xianghui Du
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.