Literature DB >> 10527924

Reconstructing Early Events in Eukaryotic Evolution.

.   

Abstract

Resolving the order of events that occurred during the transition from prokaryotic to eukaryotic cells remains one of the greatest problems in cell evolution. One view, the Archezoa hypothesis, proposes that the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria occurred relatively late in eukaryotic evolution and that several mitochondrion-lacking protist groups diverged before the establishment of the organelle. Phylogenies based on small subunit ribosomal RNA and several protein-coding genes supported this proposal, placing amitochondriate protists such as diplomonads, parabasalids, and Microsporidia as the earliest diverging eukaryotic lineages. However, trees of other molecules, such as tubulins, heat shock protein 70, TATA box-binding protein, and the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II, indicate that Microsporidia are not deeply branching eukaryotes but instead are close relatives of the Fungi. Furthermore, recent discoveries of mitochondrion-derived genes in the nuclear genomes of entamoebae, Microsporidia, parabasalids, and diplomonads suggest that these organisms likely descend from mitochondrion-bearing ancestors. Although several protist lineages formally remain as candidates for Archezoa, most evidence suggests that the mitochondrial endosymbiosis took place prior to the divergence of all extant eukaryotes. In addition, discoveries of proteobacterial-like nuclear genes coding for cytoplasmic proteins indicate that the mitochondrial symbiont may have contributed more to the eukaryotic lineage than previously thought. As genome sequence data from parabasalids and diplomonads accumulate, it is becoming clear that the last common ancestor of these protist taxa and other extant eukaryotic groups already possessed many of the complex features found in most eukaryotes but lacking in prokaryotes. However, our confidence in the deeply branching position of diplomonads and parabasalids among eukaryotes is weakened by conflicting phylogenies and potential sources of artifact. Our current picture of early eukaryotic evolution is in a state of flux.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527924     DOI: 10.1086/303290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  47 in total

1.  Mitochondrial-type hsp70 genes of the amitochondriate protists, Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica and two microsporidians.

Authors:  Nobuko Arisue; Lidya B Sánchez; Louis M Weiss; Miklós Müller; Tetsuo Hashimoto
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 2.  Mitochondria and hydrogenosomes are two forms of the same fundamental organelle.

Authors:  T Martin Embley; Mark van der Giezen; David S Horner; Patricia L Dyal; Peter Foster
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The function of genomes in bioenergetic organelles.

Authors:  John F Allen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  How big is the iceberg of which organellar genes in nuclear genomes are but the tip?

Authors:  W F Doolittle; Y Boucher; C L Nesbø; C J Douady; J O Andersson; A J Roger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Evidence for Golgi bodies in proposed 'Golgi-lacking' lineages.

Authors:  Joel B Dacks; Lesley A M Davis; Asa M Sjögren; Jan O Andersson; Andrew J Roger; W Ford Doolittle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Phylogenetic analysis of eukaryotes using heat-shock protein Hsp90.

Authors:  Alexandra Stechmann; Thomas Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 7.  Protist taxonomy: an ecological perspective.

Authors:  Bland J Finlay
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  The evolutionary processes of mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes differ from those of nuclear genomes.

Authors:  Helena Korpelainen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-09-28

Review 9.  Mitochondria, hydrogenosomes and mitosomes: products of evolutionary tinkering!

Authors:  Johannes H P Hackstein; Joachim Tjaden; Martijn Huynen
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  Comparative analysis of the ribosomal components of the hydrogenosome-containing protist, Trichomonas vaginalis.

Authors:  Nobuko Arisue; Yasushi Maki; Hideji Yoshida; Akira Wada; Lidya B Sánchez; Miklós Müller; Tetsuo Hashimoto
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.