Literature DB >> 12594916

The function of genomes in bioenergetic organelles.

John F Allen1.   

Abstract

Mitochondria and chloroplasts are energy-transducing organelles of the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. They originated as bacterial symbionts whose host cells acquired respiration from the precursor of the mitochondrion, and oxygenic photosynthesis from the precursor of the chloroplast. The host cells also acquired genetic information from their symbionts, eventually incorporating much of it into their own genomes. Genes of the eukaryotic cell nucleus now encode most mitochondrial and chloroplast proteins. Genes are copied and moved between cellular compartments with relative ease, and there is no obvious obstacle to successful import of any protein precursor from the cytosol. So why are any genes at all retained in cytoplasmic organelles? One proposal is that these small but functional genomes provide a location for genes that is close to, and in the same compartment as, their gene products. This co-location facilitates rapid and direct regulatory coupling. Redox control of synthesis de novo is put forward as the common property of those proteins that must be encoded and synthesized within mitochondria and chloroplasts. This testable hypothesis is termed CORR, for co-location for redox regulation. Principles, predictions and consequences of CORR are examined in the context of competing hypotheses and current evidence.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12594916      PMCID: PMC1693096          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  131 in total

Review 1.  Non-mitochondrial ATP transport.

Authors:  H H Winkler; H E Neuhaus
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 2.  Mitochondrial gene therapy: an arena for the biomedical use of inteins.

Authors:  A D de Grey
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 3.  Does complexity constrain organelle evolution?

Authors:  William Zerges
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  Evolution of organelles and eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  L Bogorad
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Modification of a glnB-like gene product by photosynthetic electron transport in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus 6301.

Authors:  M A Harrison; J N Keen; J B Findlay; J F Allen
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1990-05-07       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 6.  The evolutionary origin of the mitochondrion: a nonsymbiotic model.

Authors:  H R Mahler; R A Raff
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1975

7.  Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: how much, what happens, and Why?

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 8.  Mechanisms for redox control of gene expression.

Authors:  C E Bauer; S Elsen; T H Bird
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 15.500

9.  Protein disulfide isomerase as a regulator of chloroplast translational activation.

Authors:  J Kim; S P Mayfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  NAD turnover and utilisation of metabolites for RNA synthesis in a reaction sensing the redox state of the cytochrome b6f complex in isolated chloroplasts.

Authors:  C K Pearson; S B Wilson; R Schaffer; A W Ross
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1993-12-01
View more
  88 in total

Review 1.  Secondary loss of chloroplasts in trypanosomes.

Authors:  William Martin; Piet Borst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: frequent and in big chunks.

Authors:  William Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Covariation of mitochondrial genome size with gene lengths: evidence for gene length reduction during mitochondrial evolution.

Authors:  André Schneider; Dieter Ebert
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 4.  The evolutionary processes of mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes differ from those of nuclear genomes.

Authors:  Helena Korpelainen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-09-28

Review 5.  Biochemistry and evolution of anaerobic energy metabolism in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Miklós Müller; Marek Mentel; Jaap J van Hellemond; Katrin Henze; Christian Woehle; Sven B Gould; Re-Young Yu; Mark van der Giezen; Aloysius G M Tielens; William F Martin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Higher plant photosystem II light-harvesting antenna, not the reaction center, determines the excited-state lifetime-both the maximum and the nonphotochemically quenched.

Authors:  Erica Belgio; Matthew P Johnson; Snježana Jurić; Alexander V Ruban
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  The energetics of genome complexity.

Authors:  Nick Lane; William Martin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Why chloroplasts and mitochondria retain their own genomes and genetic systems: Colocation for redox regulation of gene expression.

Authors:  John F Allen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Degenerate mitochondria.

Authors:  Mark van der Giezen; Jorge Tovar
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  Complete nucleotide sequence of the chlorarachniophyte nucleomorph: nature's smallest nucleus.

Authors:  Paul R Gilson; Vanessa Su; Claudio H Slamovits; Michael E Reith; Patrick J Keeling; Geoffrey I McFadden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.