Literature DB >> 10527311

Quantitative MR measures of three-dimensional patellar kinematics as a research and diagnostic tool.

F T Sheehan1, J E Drace.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A three-dimensional (3D) study of normal patellar-femoral-tibial (knee) joint kinematics was performed using Cine Phase Contrast Magnetic resonance imaging (Cine-PC MRI) to determine the utility of this technique as a diagnostic tool in defining alterations in patellar tracking.
METHODS: Cine-PC MRI was originally developed to measure heart motion and blood flow and has now been adapted to the study of the musculoskeletal system. Thus, for the first time knee joint kinematics can be studied three-dimensionally, noninvasively, and in vivo during dynamic volitional leg extensions under load. Cine-PC MRI provides one anatomic and three orthogonal velocity images (vx, vy, and vz) for each time frame within the motion cycle. Bone displacements are calculated using integration and are then converted into both 3D orientation angles and 2D clinical angles.
RESULTS: The 3D patellar tilt and 2D clinical patellar tilt angle were nearly identical, even though these two angles have distinct mathematical definitions. The precision of the 2D clinical patellar tilt angle (N = 3) was approximately 2.4 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: Since the overall subject (N = 18) variability for clinical patellar tilt angle and medial/lateral patellar displacement was low (SD = 2.9 degrees and 3.3 mm, respectively), Cine-PC MRI could prove to be a valuable tool in studying subtle changes in patellar tracking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527311     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199910000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  8 in total

1.  Methodological concerns using intra-cortical pins to measure tibiofemoral kinematics.

Authors:  D K Ramsey; P F Wretenberg; D L Benoit; M Lamontagne; G Németh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Estimating Motion From MRI Data.

Authors:  Cengizhan Ozturk; J Andrew Derbyshire; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.961

Review 3.  MRI of weight bearing and movement.

Authors:  L M Shapiro; G E Gold
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Feasibility of using real-time MRI to measure joint kinematics in 1.5T and open-bore 0.5T systems.

Authors:  Christine E Draper; Juan M Santos; Lampros C Kourtis; Thor F Besier; Michael Fredericson; Gary S Beaupre; Garry E Gold; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  MRI-based analysis of patellofemoral cartilage contact, thickness, and alignment in extension, and during moderate and deep flexion.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Frances T Sheehan; Amy L Lerner
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Q-angle and J-sign: indicative of maltracking subgroups in patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; Aditya Derasari; Kenneth M Fine; Timothy J Brindle; Katharine E Alter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Understanding patellofemoral pain with maltracking in the presence of joint laxity: complete 3D in vivo patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; Aditya Derasari; Timothy J Brindle; Katharine E Alter
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 8.  Dynamic Evaluation of Patellofemoral Instability: A Clinical Reality or Just a Research Field? A Literature review.

Authors:  Sergio Barroso Rosa; Peter Mc Ewen; Kenji Doma; Juan Francisco Loro Ferrer; Andrea Grant
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.