Literature DB >> 10525509

Stroke and atrial fibrillation: is stroke prevention treatment appropriate beforehand? SAFE I Study Investigators.

D Deplanque1, F Corea, C Arquizan, L Parnetti, J L Mas, V Gallai, D Leys.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a pilot study before conducting a large European multicentre prospective study, to determine the proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation who were not receiving antithrombotic treatment before stroke onset, and their characteristics. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: The stroke in atrial fibrillation ensemble (SAFE) I study was an observational study conducted in 213 patients with atrial fibrillation consecutively admitted in 1997 to three European centres for an acute stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). It was determined whether they were receiving prior antithrombotic treatment.
RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation was known before stroke in 148 patients (69.5%). Of 213 patients, 34 (16.0%) were receiving anticoagulation treatment before stroke, but only six had an international normalised ratio between 2. 0 and 3.5; 65 (30.5%) were receiving antiplatelet treatment; and three (1.4%) were receiving both anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment. Of 137 patients eligible for oral anticoagulation, 108 (78.8%) did not receive treatment. Of 142 patients eligible for any antithrombotic treatment, 62 (43.7%) were not treated. The logistic regression analysis, assuming anticoagulation treatment as a dependent variable, found digoxin treatment, absence of arterial hypertension, mitral stenosis, and cardioversion as independent factors. Assuming any antithrombotic treatment as a dependent variable, previously known atrial fibrillation, lower age, being a non-smoker, and absence of arterial hypertension were found to be independent factors.
CONCLUSION: More than half of the patients with atrial fibrillation admitted for acute stroke or TIA were not receiving any antithrombotic treatment beforehand. New onset atrial fibrillation and contraindications account for a minority of non-prescriptions; thus, other reasons should be identified to improve stroke prevention in the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10525509      PMCID: PMC1760784          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.82.5.563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  22 in total

1.  Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study.

Authors:  P A Wolf; R B D'Agostino; A J Belanger; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Survey of use of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  P M Bath; A Prasad; M M Brown; G A MacGregor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-23

3.  Physician variation in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  G Y Lip; J Zarifis; R D Watson; D G Beevers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Physicians' attitudes toward oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Kutner; G Nixon; F Silverstone
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-10

5.  Epidemiologic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; R D Abbott; D D Savage; P M McNamara
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Incidence and survival rates during a two-year period of intracerebral and subarachnoid haemorrhages, cortical infarcts, lacunes and transient ischaemic attacks. The Stroke Registry of Dijon: 1985-1989.

Authors:  M Giroud; C Milan; P Beuriat; P Gras; E Essayagh; P Arveux; R Dumas
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Epidemiologic assessment of chronic atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke: the Framingham study.

Authors:  P A Wolf; T R Dawber; H E Thomas; W B Kannel
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Physician attitudes about anticoagulation for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the elderly.

Authors:  D C McCrory; D B Matchar; G Samsa; L L Sanders; E L Pritchett
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-02-13

9.  Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.

Authors:  H P Adams; B H Bendixen; L J Kappelle; J Biller; B B Love; D L Gordon; E E Marsh
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Does efficacy in clinical trials translate into effectiveness in practice?

Authors:  L K Gottlieb; S Salem-Schatz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-09-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Secondary prevention after ischemic stroke. Evolution over time in practice.

Authors:  Marie Girot; Marie-Anne Mackowiak-Cordoliani; Dominique Deplanque; Hilde Hénon; Christian Lucas; Didier Leys
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Misuse of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients: frequent, pervasive and persistent.

Authors:  Luciana S Fornari; Daniela Calderaro; Ivana B Nassar; Cristiane Lauretti; Lidia Nakamura; Renato Bagnatori; Walter Ageno; Bruno Caramelli
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Heart diseases and stroke.

Authors:  Cathy A Sila
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Stroke prevention and atrial fibrillation: reasons leading to an inappropriate management. Main results of the SAFE II study.

Authors:  Dominique Deplanque; Didier Leys; Lucilla Parnetti; Reinhold Schmidt; Jose Ferro; Jacques De Reuck; Jean-Louis Mas; Virgilio Gallai
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.335

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.