Literature DB >> 10524784

Rigid contact lens fitting relationships in keratoconus. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Group.

T B Edrington1, L B Szczotka, J T Barr, J F Achtenberg, D S Burger, A M Janoff, H E Olafsson, M W Chun, J W Boyle, M O Gordon, K Zadnik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although the influence of flat-fitting contact lenses on corneal scarring in keratoconus is frequently debated, the current standard of care with regard to the apical fitting relationship in keratoconus remains undocumented.
METHODS: Patients were examined at baseline in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study (N = 1209). Patients wearing a rigid contact lens in one or both eyes (N = 808) had their habitual rigid contact lenses analyzed, and the fluorescein patterns and base curves were compared to the first definite apical clearance lens (FDACL). The FDACL is the flattest lens in the CLEK Study trial lens set that exhibits an apical clearance fluorescein pattern. For patients wearing a rigid contact lens in both eyes, one eye was selected randomly for analysis.
RESULTS: Twelve percent of the rigid contact lens-wearing eyes were wearing lenses fitted with apical clearance based upon the clinician's fluorescein pattern interpretation. The remainder (88%) was wearing lenses fitted with apical touch. For mild (steep keratometric reading <45 D) keratoconus corneas, the mean estimate of the base curve to cornea-fitting relationship was 1.18 D flat (SD +/- 1.84 D); moderate (steep keratometric reading: 45 to 52 D) corneas were fitted on average 2.38 D flat (SD +/- 2.56 D); and severe (steep keratometric reading > 52 D) corneas were fitted an average of 4.01 D flat (SD +/- 4.11 D).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the potential risk for corneal scarring imposed by flat-fitting rigid contact lenses, most CLEK Study patients wear flat-fitting lenses. Overall, rigid lenses were fitted an average of 2.86 D (SD +/- 3.31 D) flatter than the FDACL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10524784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  9 in total

1.  Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: methods and findings to date.

Authors:  H Wagner; J T Barr; K Zadnik
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Evaluation of rigid gas permeable lens fitting in keratoconic patients with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Amal M Elbendary; Waleed Abou Samra
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Effects of multicurve RGP contact lens use on topographic changes in keratoconus.

Authors:  Joon Seo Hwang; Jin Hak Lee; Won Ryang Wee; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-03

4.  Contact Lenses for Keratoconus- Current Practice.

Authors:  Marilita M Moschos; Eirini Nitoda; Panagiotis Georgoudis; Miltos Balidis; Eleftherios Karageorgiadis; Nikos Kozeis
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2017-07-31

5.  A comparison of the visual acuity outcome between Clearkone and RGP lenses.

Authors:  Mohammadali Hassani; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Ali Mirzajani; AbbasAli Yekta; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-26

6.  Short-term changes in topometric indices after discontinuation of rigid gas permeable lens wear in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Preetam Kumar; Mohd Hasnat Ali; Jagadesh C Reddy; Pravin K Vaddavalli
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 7.  How Can We Best Measure the Performance of Scleral Lenses? Current Insights.

Authors:  Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Daddi Fadel; Melissa Barnett
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 8.  Contact lens in keratoconus.

Authors:  Varsha M Rathi; Preeji S Mandathara; Srikanth Dumpati
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Estimation of the hybrid lens parameters through rigid gas permeable lens fitting.

Authors:  Mohammadali Hasani; Hassan Hashemi; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Abbas Ali Yekta; Nooshin Dadbin; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.