K Stavem1, J Boe, J Erikssen. 1. HELTEF Foundation for Health Services Research, Nordbyhagen, Norway. knut.stavem@klinmed.uio.no
Abstract
SETTING: A secondary hospital outside Oslo. OBJECTIVE: To assess relationships between health status and measures of dyspnea, lung function and exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to identify dimensions where lung-specific instruments associate and discriminate better than general measures. DESIGN: We assessed health status in 59 out-patients with COPD, using the following instruments: Short Form 36 (SF-36)-a general health status measure, Respiratory Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)-a lung-specific measure, the Karnofsky performance scale, and a rating scale. All patients rated their dyspnea and had spirometry and exercise capacity measured. RESULTS: Mean (SD) patient age was 57.3 (9.7) years, FEV1 47% (15%) of predicted, 6 minute walk distance 503 m (122 m). Dyspnea was the strongest predictor for health status. Both SF-36 and RQLQ had dimensions associating well with dyspnea and exercise capacity. The associations with FEV1 ranged from none to moderate. CONCLUSION: All RQLQ scales had a moderate to substantial association with indices of dyspnea and exercise capacity, while the SF-36 associated well only in dimensions related to physical health. The general measure has a broader scope and complements the lung-specific measure. These findings support the construct validity of both the SF-36 and the RQLQ, and justify using a general measure to supplement a lung-specific measure.
SETTING: A secondary hospital outside Oslo. OBJECTIVE: To assess relationships between health status and measures of dyspnea, lung function and exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to identify dimensions where lung-specific instruments associate and discriminate better than general measures. DESIGN: We assessed health status in 59 out-patients with COPD, using the following instruments: Short Form 36 (SF-36)-a general health status measure, Respiratory Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)-a lung-specific measure, the Karnofsky performance scale, and a rating scale. All patients rated their dyspnea and had spirometry and exercise capacity measured. RESULTS: Mean (SD) patient age was 57.3 (9.7) years, FEV1 47% (15%) of predicted, 6 minute walk distance 503 m (122 m). Dyspnea was the strongest predictor for health status. Both SF-36 and RQLQ had dimensions associating well with dyspnea and exercise capacity. The associations with FEV1 ranged from none to moderate. CONCLUSION: All RQLQ scales had a moderate to substantial association with indices of dyspnea and exercise capacity, while the SF-36 associated well only in dimensions related to physical health. The general measure has a broader scope and complements the lung-specific measure. These findings support the construct validity of both the SF-36 and the RQLQ, and justify using a general measure to supplement a lung-specific measure.
Authors: Eléonore F van Dam van Isselt; Karin H Groenewegen-Sipkema; Monica Spruit-van Eijk; Niels H Chavannes; Margot W M de Waal; Daisy J A Janssen; Wilco P Achterberg Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Wytske A Altenburg; Marieke L Duiverman; Nick H T Ten Hacken; Huib A M Kerstjens; Mathieu H G de Greef; Peter J Wijkstra; Johan B Wempe Journal: Respir Res Date: 2015-02-19
Authors: Janelle Yorke; Naimat Khan; Adam Garrow; Sarah Tyson; Dave Singh; Jorgen Vestbo; Paul W Jones Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2022-09-15
Authors: Signe Berit Bentsen; Anne Hildur Henriksen; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Berit Rokne Hanestad; Astrid Klopstad Wahl Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2008-12-18 Impact factor: 3.186