Literature DB >> 10522777

The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog.

I S Moon1, T Berglundh, I Abrahamsson, E Linder, J Lindhe.   

Abstract

The present study was performed in order to examine the composition of the connective tissue that forms an attachment to a dental implant. 6 beagle dogs were used. All mandibular premolars were extracted. After 3 months of healing, 6 fixtures--3 in each side of the mandible--(Astra Tech Implants, Dental System TiO blast; Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were installed. After another 3 months of healing, abutment (Uni-abutment 45; Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) connection was performed and a plaque control program was initiated. The animals were sacrificed and perfused with a fixative through the carotid arteries. Each implant site, including the implant and the soft and hard peri-implant tissues, was dissected, decalcified in EDTA and further processed using a "fracture technique". The specimens were subsequently embedded in EPON, cut with the microtome set at 3 microm and the sections stained in PAS and toluidine blue. From the EPON-embedded blocks, ultra-thin sections were cut and electron micrographs were prepared. The detailed histologic and morphometrical examinations were restricted to a 200 microm wide zone of connective tissue interposed between the apical border of the junctional epithelium and the bone tissue. In the analysis, this zone was further subdivided into 2 different units; (i) one central, 40 microm wide unit (zone A) located immediately next to the implant surface, and (ii) one lateral, 160 microm wide unit (zone B) that was continuous with the central unit. The implant surface apical of the junctional epithelium and coronal of the bone crest appeared to be in direct contact with a connective tissue. Zone A of this connective tissue was characterized by its (i) absence of blood vessels and (ii) abundance of fibroblasts which were interposed between thin collagen fibers. The more lateral zone B contained comparatively fewer fibroblasts, but more collagen fibers and blood vessels. There are reasons to assume that the fibroblast rich barrier tissue next to the titanium surface plays a rôle in the maintenance of a proper seal between the oral environment and the peri-implant bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10522777     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.261005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  28 in total

1.  Influence of CAD/CAM zirconia for implant-abutment manufacturing on gingival fibroblasts and oral keratinocytes.

Authors:  A M Pabst; C Walter; A Bell; M Weyhrauch; I Schmidtmann; H Scheller; K M Lehmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The difference of fibroblast behavior on titanium substrata with different surface characteristics.

Authors:  Akihiro Furuhashi; Yasunori Ayukawa; Ikiru Atsuta; Hideyuki Okawachi; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  A proof of concept gene-activated titanium surface for oral implantology applications.

Authors:  Noah Z Laird; Walla I Malkawi; Jaidev L Chakka; Timothy M Acri; Satheesh Elangovan; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.963

4.  Comparative assessment of the interfacial soft and hard tissues investing implants and natural teeth in the macaque mandible.

Authors:  Chong Huat Siar; Chooi Gait Toh; Georgios E Romanos; Kok Han Ng
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  In vitro assessment of the soft tissue/implant interface using porcine gingival explants.

Authors:  Aous A Abdulmajeed; Jaana Willberg; Stina Syrjänen; Pekka K Vallittu; Timo O Närhi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Soft tissue augmentation around osseointegrated and uncovered dental implants: a systematic review.

Authors:  Renzo G Bassetti; Alexandra Stähli; Mario A Bassetti; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Wound models for periodontal and bone regeneration: the role of biologic research.

Authors:  Anton Sculean; Iain L C Chapple; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

Review 8.  Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Renzo G Bassetti; Alexandra Stähli; Mario A Bassetti; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Various Surface Treatments to Implant Provisional Restorations and Their Effect on Epithelial Cell Adhesion: A Comparative In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Darya Luchinskaya; Rong Du; David M Owens; Dennis Tarnow; Nurit Bittner
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.454

10.  The Effect of Fibronectin-Immobilized Microgrooved Titanium Substrata on Cell Proliferation and Expression of Genes and Proteins in Human Gingival Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Eun-Cheol Kim; Do Yun Lee; Myung-Hyun Lee; Hong Jae Lee; Kyung-Hee Kim; Richard Leesungbok; Su-Jin Ahn; Su-Jung Park; Joon-Ho Yoon; Yu-Jin Jee; Sang Cheon Lee; Suk Won Lee
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.