Literature DB >> 10520970

Fluoride release from restorative materials and its effects on dentin demineralization.

C Francci1, T G Deaton, R R Arnold, E J Swift, J Perdigão, J W Bawden.   

Abstract

As the use of adhesive restorative materials has increased during the last several years, interest in adhesive materials that release fluoride has also grown. The purpose of this study was to measure fluoride release from several adhesive restorative materials and to evaluate its effect on dentin resistance to demineralization and on bacterial metabolism in a modified in vitro system. Standardized cavities (1.8 mm in diameter) were prepared in bovine teeth that had been ground to dentin. One cavity in each tooth was restored with one of the following restorative systems: (a) Single Bond and Z100; (b) Single Bond and Tetric Ceram; (c) Fuji Bond LC and Z100; (d) Fuji Bond LC and Tetric Ceram; (e) Fuji II LC; or (f) Fuji IX GP. The other cavity in each tooth was "restored" with wax as a control. For each restorative system, 12 specimens were evaluated for fluoride release during the first 24 hrs after restoration placement. Dentin adjacent to the restored sites was subjected to lactic acid challenge (pH 4.3) for 3 hrs, after which calcium release was measured. Another 12 specimens in each group were stored for 24 hrs in de-ionized water, and were exposed to an S. mutans suspension (1:1 THB/de-ionized water and 50 mM glucose, A660 = 0.2) for 6 hrs, followed by calcium release and pH measurement. Bulk specimens of each material were also made and stored in water. Fluoride released from Fuji Bond LC, Fuji IX GP, and Fuji II LC in bulk was significantly greater than from the other materials. In the restored dentin specimens, increased resistance to demineralization from a lactic acid challenge was directly related to fluoride release. The same effects were seen as a result of the S. mutans challenge. While fluoride release from restorative materials increased the resistance of dentin to demineralization in this system, the clinical relevance of the findings is not known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10520970     DOI: 10.1177/00220345990780101001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  15 in total

1.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Ruchika Bansal; Tajinder Bansal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

2.  Fluoride release and recharge from different materials used as fissure sealants.

Authors:  Sule Bayrak; Emine Sen Tunc; Abdurrahman Aksoy; Ertan Ertas; Dilek Guvenc; Sezin Ozer
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-07

3.  Bone cements and fillers: a review.

Authors:  S M Kenny; M Buggy
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Antimicrobial properties, compressive strength and fluoride release capacity of essential oil-modified glass ionomer cements-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Dalia I Sherief; Marwa S Fathi; Reham K Abou El Fadl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Recharge pattern of contemporary glass ionomer restoratives.

Authors:  Farahnaz Arbabzadeh-Zavareh; Tim Gibbs; Ian A Meyers; Majid Bouzari; Shiva Mortazavi; Laurence J Walsh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-03

6.  Comparison of the amount of fluoride release from nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer, conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  Sumitha Upadhyay; Arathi Rao; Ramya Shenoy
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-03-31

7.  Fluoride content and recharge ability of five glassionomer dental materials.

Authors:  Dejan Lj Markovic; Bojan B Petrovic; Tamara O Peric
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Effect of a CO2 Laser on the Inhibition of Root Surface Caries Adjacent to Restorations of Glass Ionomer Cement or Composite Resin: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  L C Daniel; F C Araújo; B R Zancopé; F S Hanashiro; M Nobre-dos-Santos; M N Youssef; W C Souza-Zaroni
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-08-12

9.  Fluoride: Is It Worth to be added in Pit and Fissure Sealants?

Authors:  Ar Prabhakar; Prasanna T Dahake; Os Raju; N Basappa
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2012-02-24

10.  Fluoride release of six restorative materials in water and pH-cycling solutions.

Authors:  Rosa Maria Viana de Bragança Garcez; Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf; Paulo Amarante de Araújo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.