Literature DB >> 10520706

Quality assurance in PET: evaluation of the clinical relevance of detector defects.

R Buchert1, K H Bohuslavizki, J Mester, M Clausen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Defective detector blocks in PET may cause serious image artifacts. To estimate the influence of malfunctioning detectors on image quality, a method is described for transferring the actual detector defect onto previously acquired scans.
METHODS: Consequences of detector defects of varying types and extensions were simulated in phantom studies as well as in clinical 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose investigations. First, a condition frame was obtained by dividing the sinogram of a blank measurement, obtained with rod sources on the defective PET camera, by the sinogram of a reference blank acquired before the appearance of the defect. Second, the sinogram of a previously acquired typical patient study was multiplied by the condition frame and reconstructed. Thereafter, images from corrupted sinograms were compared visually with their originals. For repairing defective sinograms, linear interpolation and the constrained Fourier space method were tested.
RESULTS: The effects of detector defects can be simulated accurately in patient studies. The correction methods applied are especially helpful in cases of (a) several neighboring defective detectors and small study objects, (b) small hot artifacts and (c) several nonadjacent defective detectors. Linear interpolation is faster than the constrained Fourier space method; it is more widely applicable and provides similar results.
CONCLUSION: The proposed approach allows specific evaluation of clinical consequences of detector defects. This technique simplifies the decision as to whether a planned patient study can be performed or must be postponed. Even in cases of serious detector problems, sinogram repair may help eliminate image artifacts and minimize the loss of image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10520706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  6 in total

1.  FDG-PET: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Cumali Aktolun; Richard P Baum; Angelika Bishof-Delaloye; John Buscombe; Jean François Chatal; Lorenzo Maffioli; Roy Moncayo; Luc Mortelmans; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  On the significance of defective block detectors in clinical (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Esmat Elhami; Maryam Samiee; Sandor Demeter; William D Leslie; Andrew L Goertzen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  The Effect of Defective PET Detectors in Clinical Simultaneous [18F]FDG Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Gaspar Delso; Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Martin Huellner; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  PET reconstruction artifact can be minimized by using sinogram correction and filtered back-projection technique.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar Jha; Nilendu C Purandare; Sneha Shah; Archi Agrawal; Ameya D Puranik; Venkatesh Rangarajan
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2014-04

5.  Photon quantum entanglement in the MeV regime and its application in PET imaging.

Authors:  D P Watts; J Bordes; J R Brown; A Cherlin; R Newton; J Allison; M Bashkanov; N Efthimiou; N A Zachariou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Significance of Daily Quality Assurance Scan in Hardware Artifact Evaluation.

Authors:  Sachin Tayal; Arun Chandanmal Gandhi; Abbas Ali
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.