Literature DB >> 10520703

Evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response of osteogenic sarcoma using FDG PET.

M Schulte1, D Brecht-Krauss, M Werner, E Hartwig, M R Sarkar, P Keppler, J Kotzerke, A Guhlmann, G Delling, S N Reske.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: According to the current treatment protocol of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study (COSS), monitoring preoperative chemotherapy response and estimating grade of tumor regression in patients with osteosarcoma is mandatory before surgical removal of the tumor, particularly if a limb salvage procedure is intended. In addition, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered as an important prognostic indicator. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the usefulness of 2-(18F) fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET in the noninvasive evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma.
METHODS: In 27 patients with osteosarcoma, we determined tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) of FDG uptake with PET, before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to COSS 86c or COSS 96 protocols, respectively. We compared changes in glucose metabolism of osteosarcomas with the histologic grade of regression in the resected specimen, according to Salzer-Kuntschik, discriminating responders (grades I-III; n = 17) and nonresponders (grades IV-VI; n = 10).
RESULTS: The decrease of FDG uptake in osteosarcomas expressed as a ratio of posttherapeutic and pretherapeutic TBRs showed a close correlation to the amount of tumor necrosis induced by polychemotherapy (P < 0.001; Spearman). With a TBR ratio cutoff level of 0.6, all responders and 8 of 10 nonresponders could be identified by PET. In addition, lung metastases of osteosarcoma were detected with FDG PET in 4 patients.
CONCLUSION: FDG PET provides a promising tool for noninvasive evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma. This could imply consequences for the choice of surgical strategy, because a limb salvage procedure cannot be recommended in patients nonresponsive to preoperative chemotherapy unless wide surgical margins can safely be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10520703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  43 in total

1.  Is quantitation necessary for oncological PET studies? Against.

Authors:  Michael M Graham
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Imaging features of primary and secondary malignant tumours of the sacrum.

Authors:  E Thornton; K M Krajewski; K N O'Regan; A A Giardino; J P Jagannathan; N Ramaiya
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Has PET become an important clinical tool in paediatric imaging?

Authors:  Klaus Hahn; Thomas Pfluger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Pretherapeutic assessment of tumour metabolism using a dual tracer PET technique.

Authors:  T Brunkhorst; A R Boerner; S Bergh; D Otto; F W Gratz; W H Knapp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Prediction of tumour necrosis fractions using metabolic and volumetric 18F-FDG PET/CT indices, after one course and at the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in children and young adults with osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Hyung Jun Im; Tae Sung Kim; Seog-Yun Park; Hye Sook Min; June Hyuk Kim; Hyun Guy Kang; Seung Eun Park; Mi Mi Kwon; Jong Hyung Yoon; Hyeon Jin Park; Seok-ki Kim; Byung-Kiu Park
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Assessment of histological response of paediatric bone sarcomas using FDG PET in comparison to morphological volume measurement and standardized MRI parameters.

Authors:  Timm Denecke; Patrick Hundsdörfer; Daniel Misch; Ingo G Steffen; Stefan Schönberger; Christian Furth; Michail Plotkin; Juri Ruf; Hubertus Hautzel; Brigitte Stöver; Regine Kluge; Uta Bierbach; Sylke Otto; James F Beck; Christiane Franzius; Günter Henze; Holger Amthauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Clinical applications of molecular imaging in sarcoma evaluation.

Authors:  Rodney J Hicks; Guy C Toner; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Early restaging whole-body (18)F-FDG PET during induction chemotherapy predicts clinical outcome in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ruoh-Fang Yen; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Lai-Lei Ting; Kai-Yuan Tzen; Mei-Hsiu Pan; Ruey-Long Hong
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  PET imaging for Treatment Response in Cancer.

Authors:  Janet F Eary
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2008-01-01

Review 10.  18F-PET-CT in extracranial paediatric oncology: when and for whom is it useful?

Authors:  Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.