Literature DB >> 10520640

Down's syndrome screening in the UK in 1998.

N J Wald, W J Huttly, C F Hennessy.   

Abstract

The extent of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome with serum or ultrasound markers has increased over the past decade. We here present a survey of screening in the UK in 1998 and compare the results with similar surveys from 1991 and 1994.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10520640     DOI： 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03819-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN： 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  5 in total

1.  Evidence based screening for Down's syndrome. We should be prepared to re-examine entrenched practices.

Authors:  S Raeburn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-04

2.  Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies.

Authors:  R E Gilbert; C Augood; R Gupta; A E Ades; S Logan; M Sculpher; J H van Der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-25

3.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Down's syndrome screening: a controversial test, with more controversy to come!

Authors:  T M Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Psychological consequences for parents of false negative results on prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: retrospective interview study.

Authors:  S Hall; M Bobrow; T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.