Literature DB >> 10520032

High-sensitive immunophenotyping and DNA ploidy studies for the investigation of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

J Almeida1, A Orfao, M Ocqueteau, G Mateo, M Corral, M D Caballero, J Blade, M J Moro, J Hernandez, J F San Miguel.   

Abstract

Sensitive techniques for monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma (MM) are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of new intensive treatment strategies. The aim of the present study was to explore the applicability and sensitivity of flow cytometry immunophenotyping and DNA ploidy studies for the investigation of residual myelomatous plasma cells (PC) in MM patients. Bone marrow (BM) samples from 61 untreated MM patients were immunophenotypically analysed with a panel of 21 monoclonal antibodies, using a high-sensitive method based on a two-step acquisition procedure through a SSC/CD38 -CD138+ 'live-gate'. Overall, in 87% of MM cases, PC displayed an aberrant phenotype at diagnosis. The most important aberrant criteria were: antigen over-expression of CD56 (62%), CD28 (16%) and CD33 (6%) and asynchronous expression of CD117 (28%), sIg (21%) and CD20 (10%). DNA aneuploidy was found in 62% of cases. The simultaneous use of these two techniques allowed the detection of aberrant/aneuploid PC in 95% of the cases. Based on dilutional experiments, the detection limit of both techniques ranged from 10(-4) to 10(-5). In 29 stem cells harvests and 19 BM samples obtained 3 months after autologous transplantation, we have investigated the presence of residual myelomatous PC; they were detected in 44% of the stem cell collections and in 61% of the BM samples obtained after transplant. The percentage of pathological PC did not significantly change during the days of harvest. In summary, the present study shows that the combined use of immunophenotyping and DNA ploidy studies is a suitable approach for MRD investigation in MM patients based on their applicability (95% of cases) and sensitivity (up to 10(-5)).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10520032     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01685.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  23 in total

Review 1.  Bone marrow immunohistology of plasma cell neoplasms.

Authors:  A Wei; S Juneja
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Maria-Belén Vidriales; Jorge Cerveró; Gema Mateo; Jose J Pérez; Maria A Montalbán; Anna Sureda; Laura Montejano; Norma C Gutiérrez; Alfonso García de Coca; Natalia de Las Heras; Maria V Mateos; Maria C López-Berges; Raimundo García-Boyero; Josefina Galende; Jose Hernández; Luis Palomera; Dolores Carrera; Rafael Martínez; Javier de la Rubia; Alejandro Martín; Joan Bladé; Juan J Lahuerta; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Flow cytometric sensitivity and characteristics of plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma or its precursor disease: influence of biopsy site and anticoagulation method.

Authors:  Elisabet E Manasanch; Dalia A Salem; Constance M Yuan; Nishant Tageja; Manisha Bhutani; Mary Kwok; Dickran Kazandjian; George Carter; Seth M Steinberg; Diamond Zuchlinski; Marcia Mulquin; Katherine Calvo; Irina Maric; Mark Roschewski; Neha Korde; Raul Braylan; Ola Landgren; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2014-10-30

Review 4.  New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Monitoring of Measurable Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Kah Teong Soh; Paul K Wallace
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cytom       Date:  2019-07-17

6.  CD28-mediated pro-survival signaling induces chemotherapeutic resistance in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Megan E Murray; Catherine M Gavile; Jayakumar R Nair; Chandana Koorella; Louise M Carlson; Daniela Buac; Adam Utley; Marta Chesi; P Leif Bergsagel; Lawrence H Boise; Kelvin P Lee
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Flow cytometric differentiation of abnormal and normal plasma cells in the bone marrow in patients with multiple myeloma and its precursor diseases.

Authors:  Prashant R Tembhare; Constance M Yuan; David Venzon; Raul Braylan; Neha Korde; Elisabet Manasanch; Diamond Zuchlinsky; Katherine Calvo; Roger Kurlander; Manisha Bhutani; Nishant Tageja; Irina Maric; Marcia Mulquin; Mark Roschewski; Mary Kwok; David Liewehr; Ola Landgren; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.156

8.  Rare KIT (CD117) expression in multiple myeloma abrogates the usefulness of imatinib mesylate treatment.

Authors:  A Lugli; P Went; B Khanlari; Z Nikolova; S Dirnhofer
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Small-lymphoid cells and myeloid antigen expression in a patient with IgG myeloma: A case report.

Authors:  Pengjun Jiang; Wen Xia; Xuemei Sun; Xingbin Dai; Lin Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  A randomized phase II trial of fludarabine/melphalan 100 versus fludarabine/melphalan 140 followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Qaiser Bashir; Hassan Khan; Peter F Thall; Ping Liu; Nina Shah; Partow Kebriaei; Simrit Parmar; Betul Oran; Stefan Ciurea; Yago Nieto; Roy Jones; Chitra M Hosing; Uday R Popat; Yvonne T Dinh; Gabriela Rondon; Robert Z Orlowski; Jatin J Shah; Marcos De Lima; Elizabeth Shpall; Richard Champlin; Sergio Giralt; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.