Literature DB >> 10518811

Intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis: how do different agents compare?

J Corren1.   

Abstract

Intranasal steroids have proved to be an effective and safe form of therapy for allergic rhinitis. However, as the number of new glucocorticoid compounds has increased over the past decade, it has become important to consider whether significant differences exist between these agents. Pharmacologically, newer drugs such as mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate appear to have substantially higher topical potencies and lipid solubilities and lower systemic bioavailabilities than do older compounds. In clinical use, however, all the available drugs appear to be equally effective in controlling symptoms of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. With respect to adverse effects, emerging data suggest that mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate may have less potential for systemic effects during prolonged use, particularly in children. Newer intranasal steroids appear to have practical advantages over older agents that may favor their use in some groups of patients with allergic rhinitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10518811     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70310-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  14 in total

Review 1.  The economic burden of allergic rhinitis: a critical evaluation of the literature.

Authors:  Shelby D Reed; Todd A Lee; Douglas C McCrory
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Nanomedicine: evolutionary and revolutionary developments in the treatment of certain inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Istvan Szelenyi
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 3.  The effects of topical nasal steroids on continuous positive airway pressure compliance in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natamon Charakorn; Prakobkiat Hirunwiwatkul; Naricha Chirakalwasan; Busarakum Chaitusaney; Mantana Prakassajjatham
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 4.  Optimal management of nasal congestion caused by allergic rhinitis in children: safety and efficacy of medical treatments.

Authors:  Glenis Scadding
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 5.  The cost of treating allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  David A Stempel; Roger Woolf
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 6.  Safety of intranasal corticosteroid sprays during pregnancy: an updated review.

Authors:  Ahmed H Alhussien; Riyadh A Alhedaithy; Saad A Alsaleh
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  A risk-benefit assessment of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide in allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  S M Gawchik; C L Saccar
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Triamcinolone Acetonide versus Fluticasone Propionate in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial.

Authors:  Alexander V Karaulov; Tamara Vylegzhanina; Andrey Ovchinnikov; Mariia Chernikova; Nataiya Nenasheva
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.749

Review 9.  Complexities of diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory disease in the elderly.

Authors:  Paula J Busse; Kiran Kilaru
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  The treatment of vasomotor rhinitis with intranasal corticosteroids.

Authors:  Eli O Meltzer
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 4.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.