Alexander V Karaulov1, Tamara Vylegzhanina2, Andrey Ovchinnikov3, Mariia Chernikova4, Nataiya Nenasheva5. 1. Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation, drkaraulov@mail.ru. 2. National Research Center Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation. 3. Department of otorhinolaryngology of A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russian Federation. 4. Sanofi, Moscow, Russian Federation. 5. Department of Clinical Allergology of Russian Medical Academy of Postdiploma Education, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Intranasal sprays are recommended as targeted therapy for allergic rhinitis (AR). Triamcinolone acetonide is a nasal corticosteroid preparation indicated for the treatment of seasonal and perennial AR (PAR) in different countries worldwide. OBJECTIVES: In order to determine the efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of PAR, the non-inferiority of triamcinolone acetonide to fluticasone propionate was assessed in Russian adults. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, prospective, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial, a total of 260 patients with persistent PAR were randomized to receive either triamcinolone acetonide or fluticasone propionate nasal sprays for 4 weeks. The efficacy in symptom control was evaluated using the reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) from baseline (day 0) to day 28. Safety was assessed through the reporting of adverse events. RESULTS: The rTNSS mean values decreased from baseline to the end of study treatment (day 28) in both groups: -8.2 ± 3.0 in the triamcinolone acetonide arm versus -8.0 ± 2.8 in the fluticasone propionate arm. The mean difference between the groups (triamcinolone acetonide - fluticasone propionate) for rTNSS change from baseline was -0.2 (95% confidence interval -0.89 to 0.54), with an upper confidence limit of 0.54, which is lower than the non-inferiority margin of 0.8. Triamcinolone acetonide was well tolerated, with no difference in adverse event occurrence compared with fluticasone propionate. CONCLUSIONS:Triamcinolone acetonide proved to be non-inferior to fluticasone propionate in adult patients with PAR; both treatments decreased rTNSS values and showed a good safety profile. The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Intranasal sprays are recommended as targeted therapy for allergic rhinitis (AR). Triamcinolone acetonide is a nasal corticosteroid preparation indicated for the treatment of seasonal and perennial AR (PAR) in different countries worldwide. OBJECTIVES: In order to determine the efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of PAR, the non-inferiority of triamcinolone acetonide to fluticasone propionate was assessed in Russian adults. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, prospective, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial, a total of 260 patients with persistent PAR were randomized to receive either triamcinolone acetonide or fluticasone propionate nasal sprays for 4 weeks. The efficacy in symptom control was evaluated using the reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) from baseline (day 0) to day 28. Safety was assessed through the reporting of adverse events. RESULTS: The rTNSS mean values decreased from baseline to the end of study treatment (day 28) in both groups: -8.2 ± 3.0 in the triamcinolone acetonide arm versus -8.0 ± 2.8 in the fluticasone propionate arm. The mean difference between the groups (triamcinolone acetonide - fluticasone propionate) for rTNSS change from baseline was -0.2 (95% confidence interval -0.89 to 0.54), with an upper confidence limit of 0.54, which is lower than the non-inferiority margin of 0.8. Triamcinolone acetonide was well tolerated, with no difference in adverse event occurrence compared with fluticasone propionate. CONCLUSIONS:Triamcinolone acetonide proved to be non-inferior to fluticasone propionate in adult patients with PAR; both treatments decreased rTNSS values and showed a good safety profile. The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Dana V Wallace; Mark S Dykewicz; David I Bernstein; Joann Blessing-Moore; Linda Cox; David A Khan; David M Lang; Richard A Nicklas; John Oppenheimer; Jay M Portnoy; Christopher C Randolph; Diane Schuller; Sheldon L Spector; Stephen A Tilles Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Sarah K Wise; Sandra Y Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R Orlandi; Cezmi A Akdis; Jeremiah A Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M Baroody; Claus Bachert; G Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne Corey; Linda S Cox; Peter Socrates Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam DeConde; John M DelGaudio; Charles S Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E Flanagan; Wytske J Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh Halderman; Robert G Hamilton; Hans Jürgen Hoffman; Jens M Hohlfeld; Steven M Houser; Peter H Hwang; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Deborah Jarvis; Ayesha N Khalid; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Todd T Kingdom; Helene Krouse; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Adrienne M Laury; Stella E Lee; Joshua M Levy; Amber U Luong; Bradley F Marple; Edward D McCoul; K Christopher McMains; Erik Melén; James W Mims; Gianna Moscato; Joaquim Mullol; Harold S Nelson; Monica Patadia; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Michael P Platt; William Reisacher; Carmen Rondón; Luke Rudmik; Matthew Ryan; Joaquin Sastre; Rodney J Schlosser; Russell A Settipane; Hemant P Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Timothy L Smith; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; Jody R Tversky; Maria C Veling; De Yun Wang; Marit Westman; Magnus Wickman; Mark Zacharek Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: A S Nayak; M H Ellis; G N Gross; L M Mendelson; E J Schenkel; B Q Lanier; B Simpson; M E Mullin; J A Smith Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Leonard Bielory; David P Skoner; Michael S Blaiss; Bryan Leatherman; Mark S Dykewicz; Nancy Smith; Gabriel Ortiz; James A Hadley; Nicole Walstein; Timothy J Craig; Felicia Allen-Ramey Journal: Allergy Asthma Proc Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.587
Authors: Jan L Brożek; Jean Bousquet; Ioana Agache; Arnav Agarwal; Claus Bachert; Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; G Walter Canonica; Thomas Casale; Niels H Chavannes; Jaime Correia de Sousa; Alvaro A Cruz; Carlos A Cuello-Garcia; Pascal Demoly; Mark Dykewicz; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Ivan D Florez; Wytske Fokkens; Joao Fonseca; Peter W Hellings; Ludger Klimek; Sergio Kowalski; Piotr Kuna; Kaja-Triin Laisaar; Désirée E Larenas-Linnemann; Karin C Lødrup Carlsen; Peter J Manning; Eli Meltzer; Joaquim Mullol; Antonella Muraro; Robyn O'Hehir; Ken Ohta; Petr Panzner; Nikolaos Papadopoulos; Hae-Sim Park; Gianni Passalacqua; Ruby Pawankar; David Price; John J Riva; Yetiani Roldán; Dermot Ryan; Behnam Sadeghirad; Boleslaw Samolinski; Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier; Aziz Sheikh; Alkis Togias; Antonio Valero; Arunas Valiulis; Erkka Valovirta; Matthew Ventresca; Dana Wallace; Susan Waserman; Magnus Wickman; Wojtek Wiercioch; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Luo Zhang; Yuan Zhang; Mihaela Zidarn; Torsten Zuberbier; Holger J Schünemann Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Alexander V Karaulov; Natalia Nenasheva; Yury Smolkin; Aleksandr Maslakov; Luiz Lucio Journal: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Date: 2021-09-06 Impact factor: 2.749
Authors: Alexander V Karaulov; Natalia I Ilina; Natalia Shartanova; Aleksandr Maslakov; Luiz Lucio Journal: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 2.749