Literature DB >> 10516456

One-stage hypospadias repair. Experience with 544 cases.

A M Ghali1, E M el-Malik, T al-Malki, A H Ibrahim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated one-stage hypospadias repairs in providing a normal looking penis with a normal functioning urethra. Also we looked critically at the effects of the severity of hypospadias, the type of repair and the experience of the surgeon on the outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1987 to 1996 we performed 578 primary hypospadias repairs. The type and surgical results as well as the effects of certain variables on outcome were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: 544 single-stage hypospadias repairs have been followed up for a mean of 19 months (range 12-49). They included: MAGPI (92), ARAP (78), Mathieu (205), Mustarde (12), Duckett's tubularized preputial flap (142) and Onlay preputial flap (15). Despite an initial overall complication rate of 19%, the final success rate was 96%, after a mean of 1.3 procedures. Complications included fistula in 48 (9%) cases, meatal stenosis or retraction in 28 (5%), residual chordee in 17 (3%), stricture in 14 (2.5%), tubal abnormality in 10 (2%), and flap necrosis in 9 (2%). Complication rates were significantly higher (p < 0.05) when the meatus was proximal, the degree of chordee was moderate or severe and in the early series. Complication rates were also significantly higher with flap procedures and when the urethral plate was resected. Cosmetic defects occurred mainly with meatal advancement procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: A repertoire of different types of single stage procedures has allowed the successful treatment of most hypospadias cases presenting to one surgeon. Complication rates increases with the severity of hypospadias or transection of the urethral plate. A cumulative experience allows for better results via a proper selection of the procedure and a perfection of a few techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10516456     DOI: 10.1159/000020027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Concepts for correction of penile hypospadias].

Authors:  M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Salvage strategies after complications of hypospadias repair].

Authors:  M Beuke; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  MAGPI hypospadias repair: factors that determine outcome.

Authors:  M A Abdelrahman; K M O'Connor; E A Kiely
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Hypospadias: A Comprehensive Review Including Its Embryology, Etiology and Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Sattam A Halaseh; Shahed Halaseh; Mohannad Ashour
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-31

5.  Clinical experiences with different one-staged surgical methods for primary hypospadias cases.

Authors:  M Abdurrahim Imamoğlu; Hasan Bakirtaş; Can Tuygun; Hamit Ersoy; Nurettin Sertçelik
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair: outcome of three types of closure techniques.

Authors:  Kaliyaperumal Muruganandham; M S Ansari; Deepak Dubey; Anil Mandhani; Aneesh Srivastava; Rakesh Kapoor; Anant Kumar
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 7.  Management of High-Grade Penile Curvature Associated With Hypospadias in Children.

Authors:  Paulo R M Moscardi; Rafael Gosalbez; Miguel Alfedo Castellan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Risk factors for the development of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jae-Wook Chung; Seock Hwan Choi; Bum Soo Kim; Sung Kwang Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-10-19

9.  Two-stage repair for proximal hypospadias: a reappraisal.

Authors:  Saul P Greenfield
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.862

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.