OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical prognosis between patients with diffuse coronary ectasia and those with localized coronary ectasia. DESIGN: Patients with coronary ectasia were divided into two groups based on the Markis classification (group D: types I-III and group L: type IV), and the clinical manifestations and prognosis were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Group D patients (52.1 +/- 4 years) were significantly younger than group L patients (62.5 +/- 7 years). During the study, 4 patients in group D died suddenly. Three of the patients had type I coronary ectasia, and 1 had left main coronary ectasia. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study indicate that patients with diffuse coronary ectasia and left main coronary ectasia should be followed carefully.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical prognosis between patients with diffuse coronary ectasia and those with localized coronary ectasia. DESIGN:Patients with coronary ectasia were divided into two groups based on the Markis classification (group D: types I-III and group L: type IV), and the clinical manifestations and prognosis were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Group D patients (52.1 +/- 4 years) were significantly younger than group L patients (62.5 +/- 7 years). During the study, 4 patients in group D died suddenly. Three of the patients had type I coronary ectasia, and 1 had left main coronary ectasia. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study indicate that patients with diffuse coronary ectasia and left main coronary ectasia should be followed carefully.
Authors: Erdal Aktürk; Lütfü Aşkın; Hüseyin Nacar; M Hakan Taşolar; Serdar Türkmen; Mustafa Çetin; Mehmet Bozkurt Journal: Anatol J Cardiol Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 1.596