Literature DB >> 10515178

Multicentre, double-blind, randomised comparison between lamotrigine and carbamazepine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The UK Lamotrigine Elderly Study Group.

M J Brodie1, P W Overstall, L Giorgi.   

Abstract

In a multicentre, double-blind trial 150 elderly patients (mean age 77 years) with newly diagnosed epilepsy were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with lamotrigine (LTG) or carbamazepine (CBZ). Following a short titration period, the dosage was individualised for each patient while maintaining the blind over the next 24 weeks. The main difference between the groups was the rate of drop-out due to adverse events (LTG 18% versus CBZ 42%). This was in part a consequence of the lower rash rate with LTG (LTG 3%, CBZ 19%; 95% CI 7-25%). LTG-treated patients also complained less frequently of somnolence (LTG 12%, CBZ 29%; 95% CI 4-30%). Although there was no difference between the drugs in time to first seizure, a greater percentage of LTG-treated patients remained seizure-free during the last 16 weeks of treatment (LTG 39%, CBZ 21%; P = 0.027). Overall, more patients continued on treatment with LTG than CBZ (LTG 71%, CBZ 42%; P < 0.001) for the duration of the study. The hazard ratio for withdrawal was 2.4 (95% CI 1.4-4.0) indicating that a patient treated with CBZ was more than twice as likely to come off medication than one taking LTG. In conclusion, LTG can be regarded as an acceptable choice as initial treatment for elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10515178     DOI: 10.1016/s0920-1211(99)00039-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Res        ISSN: 0920-1211            Impact factor:   3.045


  77 in total

Review 1.  Place of polytherapy in the early treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  Charles L P Deckers
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  New antiepileptic drugs: comparative studies of efficacy and cognition.

Authors:  Steven L Weinstein; Joan Conry
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Pros and cons for the development of new antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  Meir Bialer; Matthew C Walker; Josemir W Sander
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Rash in psychiatric and nonpsychiatric adolescent patients receiving lamotrigine in Korea: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hee-Jong Tak; Joon-Ho Ahn; Kun-Woo Kim; Yeni Kim; Sam-Wook Choi; Kyung-Yeon Lee; Eun Jin Park; Soo-Young Bhang
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  Giving an Older Patient Newer Drugs.

Authors:  David Spencer
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 6.  Epilepsy in elderly people.

Authors:  Martin J Brodie; Patrick Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-03

7.  Volume and market share of anti-epileptic drugs in The Netherlands: impact of new drugs.

Authors:  Pieter Knoester; Charles Deckers; Ronald van der Vaart; Bert Leufkens; Yechiel Hekster
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-04

Review 8.  Prescribing antiepileptics for the elderly: differences between guideline recommendations and clinical practice.

Authors:  Mary Jo V Pugh; Perry J Foreman; Dan R Berlowitz
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Diffusion of the new antiepileptic drug lamotrigine in Dutch clinical practice.

Authors:  P D Knoester; S V Belitser; C L P Deckers; A Keyser; W O Renier; A C G Egberts; Y A Hekster
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Treatment of Epilepsy in the Elderly.

Authors:  Paul V Motika; David C Spencer
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.