Literature DB >> 10513578

Site-directed mutagenesis of the putative human muscarinic M2 receptor binding site.

F Heitz1, J A Holzwarth, J P Gies, R M Pruss, S Trumpp-Kallmeyer, M F Hibert, C Guenet.   

Abstract

Experimental probing of the model of the muscarinic M2 receptor binding site proposed by Hibert et al. [Hibert, M.F., Trumpp-Kallmeyer, S., Bruinsvels, A., Hoflak, K., 1991. Three-dimensional models of neurotransmitter G-binding protein-coupled receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8-15.] was achieved by mutating each amino-acid proposed to interact with muscarinic ligands. Pharmacological analysis of the different mutant receptors transiently expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK/293) cells was performed with a variety of agonists and antagonists. D103A, Y403A and N404A mutations prevented binding of [3H] N-methylscopolamine and [3H] quinuclidinyl benzilate with a reduction in affinity greater than 100-fold, indicating essential contributions of these residues to the binding site for the radioligands. W400A and W155A mutations had very large effects on the binding of [3H] N-methylscopolamine (150-fold, 960-fold) but modest effects on the binding of [3H] quinuclidinyl benzilate (4-fold, 17-fold). In addition, binding of oxotremorine-M, oxotremorine, arecoline and pilocarpine to W155A resulted in a greater than 100-fold decrease in affinity. Threonine mutations (T187A and T190A) alter binding of most agonists but not of antagonists. W99 makes little contribution (< 10-fold) to the binding site of the M2 receptor. D103, W155, W400, Y403 and N404 are likely to be part of the binding site for N-methylscopolamine and also to contribute to the binding site for quinuclidinyl benzilate. Some of the predicted residues do not seem to be part of the M2 receptor binding site but W155 is important for proper ligand binding on the muscarinic M2 receptor, as predicted by the proposed model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10513578     DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00439-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0014-2999            Impact factor:   4.432


  19 in total

1.  A model of the human M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Kirstin Jöhren; Hans-Dieter Höltje
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  A structural chemogenomics analysis of aminergic GPCRs: lessons for histamine receptor ligand design.

Authors:  A J Kooistra; S Kuhne; I J P de Esch; R Leurs; C de Graaf
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Muscarinic receptors as model targets and antitargets for structure-based ligand discovery.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Dahlia R Weiss; Mario Rossi; Jianxin Hu; Kelly Hu; Katrin Eitel; Peter Gmeiner; Jürgen Wess; Brian K Kobilka; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Allosteric site in M2 acetylcholine receptors: evidence for a major conformational change upon binding of an orthosteric agonist instead of an antagonist.

Authors:  Maren Grossmüller; Johannes Antony; Christian Tränkle; Ulrike Holzgrabe; Klaus Mohr
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Identification of orthosteric and allosteric site mutations in M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors that contribute to ligand-selective signaling bias.

Authors:  Karen J Gregory; Nathan E Hall; Andrew B Tobin; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Analysis of transmembrane domains 1 and 4 of the human angiotensin II AT1 receptor by cysteine-scanning mutagenesis.

Authors:  Liping Yan; Brian J Holleran; Pierre Lavigne; Emanuel Escher; Gaétan Guillemette; Richard Leduc
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Generation of a homology model of the human histamine H(3) receptor for ligand docking and pharmacophore-based screening.

Authors:  Birgit Schlegel; Christian Laggner; Rene Meier; Thierry Langer; David Schnell; Roland Seifert; Holger Stark; Hans-Dieter Höltje; Wolfgang Sippl
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Identification of an Ascaris G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor with atypical muscarinic pharmacology.

Authors:  Michael J Kimber; Laura Sayegh; Fouad El-Shehabi; Chuanzhe Song; Mostafa Zamanian; Debra J Woods; Tim A Day; Paula Ribeiro
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.981

9.  A novel mechanism of G protein-coupled receptor functional selectivity. Muscarinic partial agonist McN-A-343 as a bitopic orthosteric/allosteric ligand.

Authors:  Celine Valant; Karen J Gregory; Nathan E Hall; Peter J Scammells; Michael J Lew; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  A J Venkatakrishnan; Xavier Deupi; Guillaume Lebon; Christopher G Tate; Gebhard F Schertler; M Madan Babu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.