BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term survival of patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC). The role of radical resection for this disease is discussed controversially in the literature. We present the long-term survival and the results of re-resection versus simple cholecystectomy of the database of the Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS) from 1994 to 2004. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the gallbladder were identified out of 30,960 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-nine patients were included in our study. Long-term survival by different T-stage and comparison of patients with extended resection versus simple cholecystectomy were calculated using the log-rank test. The time-to-event data are demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The overall incidence of IGBC in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 0.28% (89 of 30,960). Fifty patients underwent simple cholecystectomy [n = 2: carcinoma in situ (CIS); n = 2: pT1a; n = 10: pT1b; n = 23: pT2; n = 8: pT3; n = 5: pT4], whereas extended resection was performed in 19 cases (n = 2: pT1b; n = 11: pT2; n = 6: pT3). The comparison of simple cholecystectomy versus extended re-resection of the gallbladder bed and regional lymph node resections showed a significant benefit in overall survival for the pT2 and pT3 group (p < 0.05). The pT1b group showed no significant benefit in overall survival (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: IGBC has a low incidence (0.28%). We present a large study of patients with IGBC, comparing the overall survival by different histological findings. We observed a significant benefit for the group with pT2 and pT3. Therefore we recommend extended resection of the gallbladder bed and the regional lymph nodes for patient with incidental histologically confirmed pT2 and pT3 carcinoma of the gallbladder after performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For patients with pT1b stage no recommendations can be given based on this study.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term survival of patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC). The role of radical resection for this disease is discussed controversially in the literature. We present the long-term survival and the results of re-resection versus simple cholecystectomy of the database of the Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS) from 1994 to 2004. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the gallbladder were identified out of 30,960 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-nine patients were included in our study. Long-term survival by different T-stage and comparison of patients with extended resection versus simple cholecystectomy were calculated using the log-rank test. The time-to-event data are demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The overall incidence of IGBC in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 0.28% (89 of 30,960). Fifty patients underwent simple cholecystectomy [n = 2: carcinoma in situ (CIS); n = 2: pT1a; n = 10: pT1b; n = 23: pT2; n = 8: pT3; n = 5: pT4], whereas extended resection was performed in 19 cases (n = 2: pT1b; n = 11: pT2; n = 6: pT3). The comparison of simple cholecystectomy versus extended re-resection of the gallbladder bed and regional lymph node resections showed a significant benefit in overall survival for the pT2 and pT3 group (p < 0.05). The pT1b group showed no significant benefit in overall survival (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: IGBC has a low incidence (0.28%). We present a large study of patients with IGBC, comparing the overall survival by different histological findings. We observed a significant benefit for the group with pT2 and pT3. Therefore we recommend extended resection of the gallbladder bed and the regional lymph nodes for patient with incidental histologically confirmed pT2 and pT3carcinoma of the gallbladder after performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For patients with pT1b stage no recommendations can be given based on this study.
Authors: Jason M Foster; Hisakazu Hoshi; John F Gibbs; Renuka Iyer; Miland Javle; Quyen Chu; Boris Kuvshinoff Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-11-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: F Lammert; M W Neubrand; R Bittner; H Feussner; L Greiner; F Hagenmüller; K H Kiehne; K Ludwig; H Neuhaus; G Paumgartner; J F Riemann; T Sauerbruch Journal: Z Gastroenterol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Renuka V Iyer; John Gibbs; Boris Kuvshinoff; Marwan Fakih; James Kepner; Nancy Soehnlein; David Lawrence; Milind M Javle Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-08-19 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: T Tsirlis; F Ausania; S A White; J J French; B C Jaques; R M Charnley; D M Manas Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: B J G A Corten; S Alexander; P H van Zwam; W K G Leclercq; R M H Roumen; G D Slooter Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Kui Sun Choi; Sae Byeol Choi; Pyoungjae Park; Wan Bae Kim; Sang Yong Choi Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Fabio Ausania; Theodoris Tsirlis; Steven A White; Jeremy J French; Bryon C Jaques; Richard M Charnley; Derek M Manas Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Jean M Butte; T Peter Kingham; Mithat Gönen; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Vincent S Yip; Dhanwant Gomez; Sean Brown; Clare Byrne; David White; Stephen W Fenwick; Graeme J Poston; Hassan Z Malik Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: T Peter Kingham; Victoria G Aveson; Alice C Wei; Jason A Castellanos; Peter J Allen; Daniel P Nussbaum; Yinin Hu; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Curr Probl Surg Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 1.909