Literature DB >> 10512212

Early mobilization versus immobilization after ankle ligament stabilization.

J Karlsson1, O Lundin, K Lind, J Styf.   

Abstract

Functional outcome, stability at radiographic investigation and ankle joint torque after anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments were evaluated in patients with early postoperative mobilization versus those with cast immobilization. Thirty patients with chronic lateral ligament instability of the ankle underwent anatomical reconstruction of the ligaments. Postoperatively the patients were randomly allocated to two groups: Group A (n=15) were immobilized in a below-knee plaster for 6 weeks and Group B (n=15) underwent early controlled range of motion training using an Air-Cast ankle brace. The functional results were evaluated using a scoring scale and objective results using standardized stress radiographs. Also eccentric and concentric muscle torque at 60 degrees/s was measured in plantar flexion and dorsiflexion, respectively. The functional results were satisfactory in 12/15 ankles in Group A and 14/15 in Group B (n.s.). All the patients with satisfactory results regained normal range of motion. Patients with unsatisfactory results had either residual pain or recurrent instability. In Group B, the strength measurements revealed significantly higher peak torque values after three months in plantar flexion at 60 degrees/s. Six months postoperatively, the torque values did not differ significantly between the groups. Also, there was no group difference in the laxity of the ankle joint, including both anterior talar translation test and talar tilt test, at the two-year follow-up. One patient had a superficial wound infection. We conclude that after the reconstruction of chronic lateral ligament instability of the ankle the functional and stability results were equally good with early postoperative mobilization and 6-week immobilization. However, using early mobilization plantar flexion strength was regained earlier than with cast immobilization, without any risk of short- or medium-term complications, such as increased ankle laxity. We recommend early mobilization after anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10512212     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1999.tb00250.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of Broström technique, suture anchor repair, and tape augmentation for reconstruction of the anterior talofibular ligament.

Authors:  R Schuh; E Benca; M Willegger; L Hirtler; S Zandieh; J Holinka; R Windhager
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Rehabilitation after anatomical ankle ligament repair or reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher J Pearce; Yves Tourné; Jennifer Zellers; Romain Terrier; Pascal Toschi; Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Simultaneous ossicle resection and lateral ligament repair give excellent clinical results with an early return to physical activity in pediatric and adolescent patients with chronic lateral ankle instability and os subfibulare.

Authors:  Maya Kubo; Youichi Yasui; Jun Sasahara; Shinya Miki; Hirotaka Kawano; Wataru Miyamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Rehabilitation of the Ankle After Acute Sprain or Chronic Instability.

Authors:  Carl G Mattacola; Maureen K Dwyer
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christophe Eechaute; Peter Vaes; Lieve Van Aerschot; Sara Asman; William Duquet
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Biomechanical stability of tape augmentation for anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair compared to the native ATFL.

Authors:  M Willegger; E Benca; L Hirtler; K Hradecky; J Holinka; R Windhager; R Schuh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Review of Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Lateral Ankle Ligament Surgery.

Authors:  Christina Hermanns; Reed Coda; Sana Cheema; Matthew L Vopat; Megan Bechtold; Armin Tarakemeh; Scott Mullen; John Paul Schroeppel; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-06-25

Review 8.  Early Versus Delayed Mobilization Postoperative Protocols for Lateral Ankle Ligament Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew L Vopat; Armin Tarakemeh; Brandon Morris; Maaz Hassan; Pat Garvin; Rosey Zackula; Scott Mullen; John Paul Schroeppel; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-06-22

9.  The use of bidirectional barbed suture in the treatment of a complete common calcanean tendon rupture in a dog: Long-term clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation.

Authors:  Kevin Frame; Oded Ben-Amotz; Renee Simpler; Josh Zuckerman; Ron Ben-Amotz
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-07-10

10.  Clinical Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Consensus Reached by Systematic Review of the Available Data.

Authors:  Yujie Song; Hongyun Li; Chao Sun; Jian Zhang; Jianchao Gui; Qinwei Guo; Weidong Song; Xiaojun Duan; Xiaoqin Wang; Xuesong Wang; Zhongming Shi; Yinghui Hua; Kanglai Tang; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.