Literature DB >> 10511642

Semantic cortical activation in dyslexic readers.

P Helenius1, R Salmelin, E Service, J F Connolly.   

Abstract

The combined temporal and spatial resolution of MEG (magnetoencephalography) was used to study whether the same brain areas are similarly engaged in reading comprehension in normal and developmentally dyslexic adults. To extract a semantically sensitive stage of brain activation we manipulated the appropriateness of sentence-ending words to the preceding sentence context. Sentences, presented visually one word at a time, either ended with a word that was (1) expected, (2) semantically appropriate but unexpected, (3) semantically anomalous but sharing the initial letters with the expected word, or (4) both semantically and orthographically inappropriate to the sentence context. In both subject groups all but the highly expected sentence endings evoked strong cortical responses, localized most consistently in the left superior temporal cortex, although additional sources were occasionally found in more posterior parietal and temporal areas and in the right hemisphere. Thus, no significant differences were found in the spatial distribution of brain areas involved in semantic processing between fluent and dyslexic readers. However, both timing and strength of activation clearly differed between the two groups. First, activation sensitivity to word meaning within a sentence context began about 100 msec later in dyslexic than in control subjects. This is likely to result from affected presemantic processing stages in dyslexic readers. Second, the neural responses were significantly weaker in dyslexic than in control subjects, indicating involvement of a smaller or less-synchronous neural population in reading comprehension. Third, in contrast to control subjects, the dyslexic readers showed significantly weaker activation to semantically inappropriate words that began with the same letters as the most expected word than to both orthographically and semantically inappropriate sentence-ending words. Thus, word recognition by the dyslexic group seemed to be qualitatively different: Whereas control subjects perceived words as wholes, dyslexic subjects may have relied on sublexical word recognition and occasionally mistook a correctly beginning word for the one they had expected.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10511642     DOI: 10.1162/089892999563599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Cortical activation during spoken-word segmentation in nonreading-impaired and dyslexic adults.

Authors:  Päivi Helenius; Riitta Salmelin; Elisabet Service; John F Connolly; Seija Leinonen; Heikki Lyytinen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Temporal order and processing acuity of visual, auditory, and tactile perception in developmentally dyslexic young adults.

Authors:  M Laasonen; E Service; V Virsu
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  What's the story? The tale of reading fluency told at speed.

Authors:  Christopher F A Benjamin; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The time and space of lexicality: a neuromagnetic view.

Authors:  Tony W Wilson; Arthur C Leuthold; Scott M Lewis; Apostolos P Georgopoulos; Patricia J Pardo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Rodolfo Llinás; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Children with reading disorder show modality independent brain abnormalities during semantic tasks.

Authors:  James R Booth; Genna Bebko; Douglas D Burman; Tali Bitan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Spatiotemporal brain maps of delayed word repetition and recognition.

Authors:  Rupali P Dhond; Thomas Witzel; Anders M Dale; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Auditory word perception in sentence context in reading-disabled children.

Authors:  Maria Mody; Daniel T Wehner; Seppo P Ahlfors
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Children with reading disability show brain differences in effective connectivity for visual, but not auditory word comprehension.

Authors:  Li Liu; Amit Vira; Emma Friedman; Jennifer Minas; Donald Bolger; Tali Bitan; James Booth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Functional MRI of sentence comprehension in children with dyslexia: beyond word recognition.

Authors:  S L Rimrodt; A M Clements-Stephens; K R Pugh; S M Courtney; P Gaur; J J Pekar; L E Cutting
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.