Literature DB >> 10511628

Response patterns and their relationship to frequency analysis in auditory forebrain centers of a songbird.

B Capsius1, H Leppelsack.   

Abstract

In the field L complex, the auditory part of the caudal telencephalon, multi-unit recordings were performed in seven awake, adult male starlings (Sturnus vulgaris, L). Pure tones in a frequency range between 0.5 and 6.0 kHz were used as stimuli. The field L complex of starlings consists of at least 11 functionally separated, tonotopically organized subcenters. The auditory processing of frequency information was investigated in eight of these areas. Two kinds of response patterns could be distinguished. The centers NA-L, NA2a, NA3 and NA4 showed phasic and sustained excitation, the other areas responded with phasic excitation only. All these auditory areas show strong tonotopic gradients, each of them representing the complete hearing range. The sharpest picture of the stimulus frequency is represented in the functional area NA-L. In relation to its total size, NA-L shows the smallest active area if stimulated by pure tones. In addition, in NA-L, only the excited neurons are surrounded by inhibited neurons during the response to a pure tone. This leads to an additional sharpening of frequency representation. In comparison with the other auditory areas, NA-L shows the greatest spatial extension of the tonotopic gradient. This, in combination with the smallest active size in NA-L, leads to the conclusion that in the primary projection field NA-L, the most neural space is available for the processing of a given frequency range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10511628     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00112-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of song perception in oscine birds.

Authors:  Daniel P Knudsen; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Hemispheric differences in processing of vocalizations depend on early experience.

Authors:  Mimi L Phan; David S Vicario
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Early experience shapes vocal neural coding and perception in songbirds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 4.  Estradiol-dependent modulation of auditory processing and selectivity in songbirds.

Authors:  Donna L Maney; Donna Maney; Raphael Pinaud
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 8.606

5.  Active recognition enhances the representation of behaviorally relevant information in single auditory forebrain neurons.

Authors:  Daniel P Knudsen; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mapping the tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex with minimally salient acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Dave R M Langers; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Social experience influences the development of a central auditory area.

Authors:  Hugo Cousillas; Isabelle George; Maryvonne Mathelier; Jean-Pierre Richard; Laurence Henry; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-08-25

8.  No need to Talk, I Know You: Familiarity Influences Early Multisensory Integration in a Songbird's Brain.

Authors:  Isabelle George; Jean-Pierre Richard; Hugo Cousillas; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Experience with adults shapes multisensory representation of social familiarity in the brain of a songbird.

Authors:  Isabelle George; Hugo Cousillas; Jean-Pierre Richard; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Linking social and vocal brains: could social segregation prevent a proper development of a central auditory area in a female songbird?

Authors:  Hugo Cousillas; Isabelle George; Laurence Henry; Jean-Pierre Richard; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.