C Y Bitkover1, K Cederlund, B Aberg, J Vaage. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. catarina.bitkover@thxkir.ks.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography is used in our hospital to diagnose complications after median sternotomy, but its efficiency is unknown. Nor is the computed tomographic appearance of normal healing of a median sternotomy known. Computed tomography was evaluated for its ability to diagnose mediastinitis and sternal dehiscence, and a reference material of normally healing median sternotomies was created. METHODS: In a prospective study, 20 patients with a normally healing median sternotomy were examined 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation. In a retrospective study, 87 scans from 65 patients that were made because a postoperative complication was suspected were reviewed. RESULTS: In the prospective study, all patients had clinically uneventful healing. None of the computed tomographic scans showed radiologic signs of healing at 3 months. At 6 months, half of the patients had healed completely. In the retrospective study, 49 scans were performed on suspicion of infection; 7 of them indicated mediastinitis, 2 were false-positive, while mediastinitis was present in a total of 16 of the scans. Thirty-eight scans were made because of sternal pain or suspected dehiscence; after 21 of the scans, recovery was uneventful, and in 11, the definite diagnosis was dehiscence or pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical healing of the sternotomy does not correlate with the computed tomographic image. Computed tomography is not a sensitive tool for diagnosing mediastinitis, and in patients with sternal pain, it adds little information.
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography is used in our hospital to diagnose complications after median sternotomy, but its efficiency is unknown. Nor is the computed tomographic appearance of normal healing of a median sternotomy known. Computed tomography was evaluated for its ability to diagnose mediastinitis and sternal dehiscence, and a reference material of normally healing median sternotomies was created. METHODS: In a prospective study, 20 patients with a normally healing median sternotomy were examined 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation. In a retrospective study, 87 scans from 65 patients that were made because a postoperative complication was suspected were reviewed. RESULTS: In the prospective study, all patients had clinically uneventful healing. None of the computed tomographic scans showed radiologic signs of healing at 3 months. At 6 months, half of the patients had healed completely. In the retrospective study, 49 scans were performed on suspicion of infection; 7 of them indicated mediastinitis, 2 were false-positive, while mediastinitis was present in a total of 16 of the scans. Thirty-eight scans were made because of sternal pain or suspected dehiscence; after 21 of the scans, recovery was uneventful, and in 11, the definite diagnosis was dehiscence or pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical healing of the sternotomy does not correlate with the computed tomographic image. Computed tomography is not a sensitive tool for diagnosing mediastinitis, and in patients with sternal pain, it adds little information.
Authors: D N Exarhos; K Malagari; E G Tsatalou; S V Benakis; C Peppas; A Kotanidou; D Chondros; C Roussos Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-12-31 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lachmandath S Tewarie; Ares K Menon; Nima Hatam; Andrea Amerini; Ajay K Moza; Rüdiger Autschbach; Andreas Goetzenich Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2012-09-09 Impact factor: 1.637