Literature DB >> 10508293

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation.

F R Korosec1, P A Turski, T J Carroll, C A Mistretta, T M Grist.   

Abstract

With contrast-enhanced MR angiographic techniques, a T1-shortening contrast agent is injected into the blood stream. Imaging during the first pass of the contrast agent permits acquisition of a high-contrast MR angiogram. Scan parameters such as flip angle, repetition time, echo time, and scan duration, and injection parameters, such as dose and rate, must be carefully chosen to achieve maximum contrast between blood vessels and stationary tissues. A critical parameter affecting image quality is the timing of the acquisition relative to the injection. If the collection of the center of k-space does not coincide with peak arterial concentration, artifacts, reduced SNR, and venous enhancement may result. Several techniques have been developed to address the timing issue. Post-processing techniques such as subtracting a pre-contrast image from a post-contrast angiogram can be used to improve image quality. Intravascular contrast agents that may also lead to improved image quality are currently being developed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10508293     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199909)10:3<317::aid-jmri14>3.0.co;2-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  7 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Gauvrit; Catherine Oppenheim; Francois Nataf; Olivier Naggara; Denis Trystram; Thierry Munier; Daniel Fredy; Jean-Pierre Pruvo; François-Xavier Roux; Xavier Leclerc; Jean-François Meder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Effects of injection rate and dose on image quality in time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) by using 1.0M contrast agents.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Henrik J Michaely; Martin Requardt; Martin Rohrer; Scott Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Radial sliding-window magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with highly-constrained projection reconstruction (HYPR).

Authors:  Hyun J Jeong; Ty A Cashen; Michael C Hurley; Christopher Eddleman; Christopher Getch; H Hunt Batjer; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Evaluation of carotid stenosis with axial high-resolution black-blood MR imaging.

Authors:  Jean M U-King-Im; Rikin A Trivedi; Evis Sala; Martin J Graves; Mathew Gaskarth; Nicholas J Higgins; Justin C Cross; William Hollingworth; Richard A Coulden; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Nagui M Antoun; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  S G Patel; D A Collie; J M Wardlaw; S C Lewis; A R Wright; R J Gibson; R J Sellar
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.154

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.