Literature DB >> 15007611

Evaluation of carotid stenosis with axial high-resolution black-blood MR imaging.

Jean M U-King-Im1, Rikin A Trivedi, Evis Sala, Martin J Graves, Mathew Gaskarth, Nicholas J Higgins, Justin C Cross, William Hollingworth, Richard A Coulden, Peter J Kirkpatrick, Nagui M Antoun, Jonathan H Gillard.   

Abstract

High-resolution axial black-blood MR imaging (BB MRI) has been shown to be able to characterise carotid plaque morphology. The aim of this study was to explore the accuracy of this technique in quantifying the severity of carotid stenosis. A prospective study of 54 patients with symptomatic carotid disease was conducted, comparing BB MRI to the gold standard, conventional digital subtraction X-ray angiography (DSA). The BB MRI sequence was a fast-spin echo acquisition (TE = 42 ms, ETL = 24, field of view = 100 x 100 mm, slice thickness = 3.0 mm) at 1.5 T using a custom-built phased-array coil. Linear measurements of luminal and outer carotid wall diameter were made directly from the axial BB MRI slices by three independent blinded readers and stenosis was calculated according to European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) criteria. There was good agreement between BB MRI and DSA (intraclass correlation = 0.83). Inter-observer agreement was good (average kappa = 0.77). BB MRI was accurate for detection of severe stenosis (> or = 80%) with sensitivity and specificity of 87 and 81%, respectively. Eight cases of "DSA-defined" moderate stenosis were overestimated as severe by BB MRI and this may be related to non-circular lumens. Axial imaging with BB MRI could potentially be used to provide useful information about severity of carotid stenosis. Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15007611     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2245-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  43 in total

Review 1.  Stable versus unstable atherosclerosis: clinical aspects.

Authors:  E Falk
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Marie E Westwood; Steven Kelly; Elizabeth Berry; John M Bamford; Michael J Gough; C Mark Airey; James F M Meaney; Linda M Davies; Jane Cullingworth; Michael A Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-26

3.  Sources of variability in measuring carotid stenosis on time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiograms.

Authors:  Patrick Turski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: utility in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Dean C C Johnston; James D Eastwood; Thanh Nguyen; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography.

Authors:  D C Johnston; L B Goldstein
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Angiographic detection of carotid plaque ulceration. Comparison with surgical observations in a multicenter study. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

Authors:  J Y Streifler; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; O R Benavente; V C Hachinski; G G Ferguson; H J Barnett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Carotid artery atherosclerosis: in vivo morphologic characterization with gadolinium-enhanced double-oblique MR imaging initial results.

Authors:  Bruce A Wasserman; William I Smith; Hugh H Trout; Richard O Cannon; Robert S Balaban; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T S Hatsukami; R Ross; N L Polissar; C Yuan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  MR imaging of the vessel wall.

Authors:  Harald H Quick; Jörg F Debatin; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  3 in total

1.  Differences of signal evolution of intraplaque hemorrhage and associated stenosis between symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid arteries: an in vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study.

Authors:  Qingjun Wang; Yong Wang; Jianming Cai; Youquan Cai; Lin Ma; Xian Xu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Assessment of carotid artery atherosclerotic disease by using three-dimensional fast black-blood MR imaging: comparison with DSA.

Authors:  Huilin Zhao; Jinnan Wang; Xiaosheng Liu; Xihai Zhao; Daniel S Hippe; Ye Cao; Jieqing Wan; Chun Yuan; Jianrong Xu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A Case of a Huge Inferior Vena Cava Leiomyosarcoma: Precise Preoperative Evaluation with Gadobutrol-Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Zhou; Meng Wang; Shaoqiang Li; Huasong Cai; Lijian Liang; Zi-Ping Li; Shi-Ting Feng; Zhenpeng Peng; Xuehua Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.989

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.