PURPOSE: Detection of micrometastases in the regional tumor-draining lymph nodes is critical for accurate staging and prognosis in melanoma patients. We hypothesized that a multiple-mRNA marker (MM) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay would improve the detection of occult metastases in the sentinel node (SN), compared with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC), and that MM expression is predictive of disease relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with clinical early-stage melanoma underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLND). Their SNs were serially sectioned and assessed for MAGE-3, MART-1, and tyrosinase mRNA expression by RT-PCR, in parallel with H&E staining and IHC, for melanoma metastases. MM expression in the SNs was correlated with H&E and IHC assay results, standard prognostic factors, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: In 17 patients with H&E- and/or IHC-positive SNs, 16 (94%) expressed two or more mRNA markers. Twenty (36%) of 55 patients with histopathologically negative SNs expressed two or more mRNA markers. By multivariate analysis, patients at increased risk of metastases to the SN had thicker lesions (P =.03), were 60 years of age or younger (P <.05), and/or were MM-positive (P <.001). Patients with histopathologically melanoma-free SNs who were MM-positive, compared with those who were positive for one or fewer mRNA markers, were at increased risk of recurrence (P =.02). Patients who were MM-positive with histopathologically proven metastases in the SN were at greatest risk of disease relapse (P =. 01). CONCLUSION: H&E staining and IHC underestimate the true incidence of melanoma metastases. MM expression in the SN more accurately reflects melanoma micrometastases and is also a more powerful predictor of disease relapse than are H&E staining and IHC alone.
PURPOSE: Detection of micrometastases in the regional tumor-draining lymph nodes is critical for accurate staging and prognosis in melanomapatients. We hypothesized that a multiple-mRNA marker (MM) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay would improve the detection of occult metastases in the sentinel node (SN), compared with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC), and that MM expression is predictive of disease relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with clinical early-stage melanoma underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLND). Their SNs were serially sectioned and assessed for MAGE-3, MART-1, and tyrosinase mRNA expression by RT-PCR, in parallel with H&E staining and IHC, for melanoma metastases. MM expression in the SNs was correlated with H&E and IHC assay results, standard prognostic factors, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: In 17 patients with H&E- and/or IHC-positive SNs, 16 (94%) expressed two or more mRNA markers. Twenty (36%) of 55 patients with histopathologically negative SNs expressed two or more mRNA markers. By multivariate analysis, patients at increased risk of metastases to the SN had thicker lesions (P =.03), were 60 years of age or younger (P <.05), and/or were MM-positive (P <.001). Patients with histopathologically melanoma-free SNs who were MM-positive, compared with those who were positive for one or fewer mRNA markers, were at increased risk of recurrence (P =.02). Patients who were MM-positive with histopathologically proven metastases in the SN were at greatest risk of disease relapse (P =. 01). CONCLUSION: H&E staining and IHC underestimate the true incidence of melanoma metastases. MM expression in the SN more accurately reflects melanoma micrometastases and is also a more powerful predictor of disease relapse than are H&E staining and IHC alone.
Authors: Steven J Hughes; Liqiang Xi; William E Gooding; David J Cole; Michael Mitas; John Metcalf; Rohit Bhargava; David Dabbs; Jesus Ching; Lynn Kozma; William McMillan; Tony E Godfrey Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Barbara G Molenkamp; Ronald J C L M Vuylsteke; Paul A M van Leeuwen; Sybren Meijer; Wim Vos; Pepijn G J T B Wijnands; Rik J Scheper; Tanja D de Gruijl Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Rebekah R White; Wilma E Stanley; Jeffrey L Johnson; Douglas S Tyler; Hilliard F Seigler Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Robert L Ferris; Liqiang Xi; Raja R Seethala; Jon Chan; Shaun Desai; Benjamin Hoch; William Gooding; Tony E Godfrey Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hiroya Takeuchi; Donald L Morton; Christine Kuo; Roderick R Turner; David Elashoff; Robert Elashoff; Bret Taback; Akihide Fujimoto; Dave S B Hoon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544