Literature DB >> 10504886

Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination.

A Hollingworth1, J M Henderson.   

Abstract

Two models of the interaction between scene meaning and object identification were tested: the description enhancement model and the criterion modulation model. The former proposes that the early activation of a scene schema facilitates the initial perceptual analysis of schema-consistent objects, the latter that schema activation modulates the amount of information necessary to indicate the presence of an object of a particular perceptual type. In Experiment 1, we employed a forced-choice, type-discrimination paradigm. Participants were asked to determine which of two semantically consistent objects or which of two semantically inconsistent objects had appeared in a briefly presented scene. Contrary to the prediction derived from both of these models, discrimination performance was better for semantically inconsistent versus consistent objects. In Experiments 2 and 3 we introduced a forced-choice, token-discrimination paradigm to further test the description enhancement model. Contrary to the prediction of that model, discrimination performance was no better for semantically consistent versus inconsistent tokens. These results suggest that both the initial perceptual analysis of an object and the matching of an object's constructed visual description to stored descriptions are isolated from stored knowledge about real-world contingencies between scenes and objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10504886     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(98)00053-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  17 in total

1.  Testing a conceptual locus for the inconsistent object change detection advantage in real-world scenes.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; John M Henderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

2.  Selective attention during scene perception: evidence from negative priming.

Authors:  Robert D Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

3.  Consistency effects between objects in scenes.

Authors:  Jodi L Davenport
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

4.  Nontarget objects can influence perceptual processes during object recognition.

Authors:  Mark E Auckland; Kyle R Cave; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

5.  Early onset of neural synchronization in the contextual associations network.

Authors:  Kestutis Kveraga; Avniel Singh Ghuman; Karim S Kassam; Elissa A Aminoff; Matti S Hämäläinen; Maximilien Chaumon; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Michael F Land
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; George A Alvarez; Ruth Rosenholtz; Yoana I Kuzmova; Ashley M Sherman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Interaction between Scene and Object Processing Revealed by Human fMRI and MEG Decoding.

Authors:  Talia Brandman; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Getting the gist of events: recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays.

Authors:  Alon Hafri; Anna Papafragou; John C Trueswell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-09-17

10.  Implicit learning of viewpoint-independent spatial layouts.

Authors:  Taiga Tsuchiai; Kazumichi Matsumiya; Ichiro Kuriki; Satoshi Shioiri
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.