Literature DB >> 10502167

Use of open access in GI endoscopy at an academic medical center.

R J Charles1, A Chak, G S Cooper, R C Wong, M V Sivak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open access endoscopy systems (those in which endoscopy is performed without prior gastroenterology consultation) are becoming more common in the current cost-conscious environment. The aim of this study was to compare appropriateness and yield of endoscopy for patients referred for open access endoscopy with those for patients who had prior contact with a gastroenterologist. We also evaluated patients' preference for undergoing open access endoscopy as opposed to having prior consultation with a gastroenterologist and compared preparedness for endoscopic procedures between the two groups.
METHODS: The cases of all outpatients referred for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy were assessed prospectively over a 5-month period. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines for indications for gastrointestinal endoscopy were used to determine appropriateness of referrals. Significant pathologic findings were rated independently by two investigators using defined criteria. Patients' opinions regarding preparedness for endoscopy and referral preference were measured by means of questionnaires administered before endoscopy.
RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of endoscopies after consultation with gastroenterologists were performed for accepted indications compared with 65% of open access procedures (p < 0.01). Significant pathologic findings were present in 40% of the former group compared with 28% of those undergoing open access endoscopy (p < 0.01). Significant pathologic findings were found in 37% of endoscopies performed for indications listed in the ASGE guidelines compared with 20% for unlisted indications (p < 0.01). Forty percent of patients referred for open access endoscopy would have preferred prior consultation with a gastroenterologist.
CONCLUSION: Patients initially seen by a gastroenterologist are more likely to undergo endoscopy for accepted indications, and the yield of endoscopy is higher than among patients referred through an open access system. The system of open access endoscopy as currently practiced may have to be reassessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10502167     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70069-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  16 in total

Review 1.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  [Study of the gastroscopies requested at a health centre].

Authors:  E Trillo Sallán; M S López Fañanás; M V Villaverde Royo; C Isanta Pomar
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Appropriateness of indication and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: first report based on the 2000 guidelines of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Iqbal Siddique; Krishna Mohan; Fuad Hasan; Anjum Memon; Istvan Patty; Basil Al-Nakib
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Appropriateness of outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy in a non-academic hospital.

Authors:  João Mangualde; Marie I Cremers; Ana M Vieira; Ricardo Freire; Elia Gamito; Cristina Lobato; Ana L Alves; Fátima Augusto; Ana P Oliveira
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-16

5.  Factors contributing to patient nonattendance at open-access endoscopy.

Authors:  Suryakanth R Gurudu; Lucía C Fry; David E Fleischer; Bradford H Jones; Marlene R Trunkenbolz; Jonathan A Leighton
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  A nine-year audit of open-access upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: results and experience of a single centre.

Authors:  Dean Keren; Tova Rainis; Edy Stermer; Alexandra Lavy
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a hospital-based study.

Authors:  L Trevisani; S Sartori; G Gilli; C M Chiamenti; P Gaudenzi; V Alvisi; P Pazzi; V Abbasciano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Appropriate use of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases: up-to-date indications for primary care providers.

Authors:  Vien X Nguyen; Vi Thuy Le Nguyen; Cuong C Nguyen
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-11-01

9.  Appropriateness of colonoscopy: diagnostic yield and safety in guidelines.

Authors:  Mario Grassini; Carlo Verna; Paolo Niola; Monica Navino; Edda Battaglia; Gabrio Bassotti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Most Premature Surveillance Colonoscopy Is Not Attributable to Bowel Preparation or New Clinical Indications.

Authors:  Vishal Desai; Daniel A Sussman; Michael Greenspan; Sandeep Dayanand; Kevin Ollington; Sheena Patel; Hong Li; Joshua Melson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.