Literature DB >> 10496466

Posterior tibial slope in the normal and varus knee.

S Matsuda1, H Miura, R Nagamine, K Urabe, T Ikenoue, K Okazaki, Y Iwamoto.   

Abstract

Posterior tibial slope was evaluated in 30 normal and 30 varus knees using magnetic resonance imaging. The mean tibial posterior slope in the medial plateau was 10.7 degrees (range: 5 degrees - 15.5 degrees) in the normal knees and 9.9 degrees (range: 1.5 degrees - 19 degrees) in the varus knees. The mean tibial posterior slope in the lateral plateau was 7.2 degrees (range: 0 degrees - 14.5 degrees) in the normal knees and 6 degrees (range: 1 degrees - 13 degrees) in the varus knees. Although these differences were not statistically significant, there was a large range in the posterior tibial slope in both groups. When 10-mm thickness of bone was resected in the middle of the lateral plateau in total knee arthroplasty, the thickness of the bone resection in the anterior and posterior part of the lateral plateau was measured. The presumed thickness of bone was 10.1 mm (range: 7.3-13.9 mm) in the anterior part and 7.5 mm (range: 5-10.3 mm) in the posterior part. A large range in the measured thickness of bone also was detected in the varus knees. These results suggest that the shape of the proximal tibia varies among individuals and that the cutting angle should be determined in each case to avoid any mismatch of the patient's posterior slope of the tibia after implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10496466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Knee Surg        ISSN: 0899-7403


  56 in total

Review 1.  Role of bone architecture and anatomy in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Julie C Baker-LePain; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Comparative study of tibial posterior slope angle following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using one of three implants.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung Ho Noh; Seong Cheol Moon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Influence of soft tissues on the proximal bony tibial slope measured with two-dimensional MRI.

Authors:  Sébastien Lustig; Corey J Scholes; Sean P M Leo; Myles Coolican; David A Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  The role of the tibial slope in sustaining and treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Craig S Mauro; Peter U Brucker; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Hinterwimmer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  [Imaging and preoperative planning for osteotomies around the knee].

Authors:  D Pape; A Hoffmann; R Seil
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 6.  The Role of Osteotomy for the Treatment of PCL Injuries.

Authors:  João V Novaretti; Andrew J Sheean; Jayson Lian; Joseph De Groot; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

7.  The effect of closed wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slope: a radiographic study.

Authors:  Erik Hohmann; Adam Bryant; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Tibial slope and high tibial osteotomy using the circular external fixator.

Authors:  Taner Gunes; Cengiz Sen; Mehmet Erdem
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Evaluation of anatomic references for tibial sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hyuk Soo Han; Chong Bum Chang; Sang Cheol Seong; Sahnghoon Lee; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The effects of patellar tendon advancement on the immature proximal tibia.

Authors:  Cameron Patthanacharoenphon; Dayle L Maples; Christina Saad; Michael J Forness; Matthew A Halanski
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.